I volunteer and work with pit bulls. What PETA has done to them is indescribable. They've called for laws against the animal and even for mandatory euthanasia in some cases(Mike Vic dogs). PETA is a tin man to most who wish to save animals. They go around half hearted only working with animals when the publicity is right. Hypocritical doesn't even come close.

Well he spoke his mind, so he's a sexist. They'll find a way to call him a racist soon enough.

Sadly all this does is distract from legitimate instances of racism and sexism.

"I Pledge" was amazing. So many young people thought it was a crock of @#$%. And outside of Twitter, the star of such classics as "Dude Where's My Car" doesn't have much sway.

Agreed. Didn't like the last administration and I don't understand how the new one is any different. I remember when artist actually gave a damn about speaking out against corrupt and powerful entities. Sad day for the world.

The DEMS here in Missouri are afraid. Outside of Kansas City and St Louis Missouri, DEMS should be afraid of 2010!

Ima buy that bus some hydraulic lifts because it has to be full underneath it.

Rotts are the number 2 dog for mauling in this country. Pits like all dogs are territorial predators. Explain to me why prior to the 1980's pits weren't responsible for most maulings?

The DBRF oh no!!!! Did you just quote it at random or did you even bother to read it? Here's some quotes from the DBRF:

"Conclusions—Although fatal attacks on humans appear to be a breed-specific problem (pit bull-type dogs and Rottweilers), other breeds may bite and cause fatalities at higher rates."

This goes to show that all dogs are predators.

"Because of difficulties inherent in determining a dog’s breed with certainty, enforcement of breed-specific ordinances raises constitutional and practical issues."

A breed can be difficult to determine? Where have I heard this before?

"Fatal attacks represent a small proportion of dog bite injuries to humans and, therefore, should not be the primary factor driving public policy concerning dangerous dogs. Many practical alternatives to breed-specific ordinances exist and hold promise for prevention of dog bites."

And here's where the owner come into play: "Several interacting factors affect a dog’s propensity
to bite, including heredity, sex, early experience, socialization and training, health (medical and behavioral), reproductive status, quality of ownership and supervision, and victim behavior."

That sure was a lot to leave out intentional. And here's where history makes you look bad, from the same CDC report by the way: "To decrease the risk of dog bites, several communities have enacted breed-specific restrictions or bans. In general, these have focused on pit bull-type dogs and Rottweilers. However, breeds responsible for human DBRF have varied over time. Pinckney and Kennedy13 studied human DBRF from May 1975 through April 1980 and listed the following breeds as responsible for the indicated number of deaths: German Shepherd Dog (n = 16); Husky-type dog (9); Saint Bernard (8); Bull Terrier (6); Great Dane (6); Malamute (5); Golden
Retriever (3); Boxer (2); Dachshund (2); Doberman Pinscher (2); Collie (2); Rottweiler (1); Basenji (1); Chow Chow (1); Labrador Retriever (1); Yorkshire Terrier (1); and mixed and unknown breed (15). As ascertained from our data, between 1979 and 1980, Great Danes caused the most reported human DBRF; between 1997 and 1998, Rottweilers and pit bull-type dogs were responsible for about 60% of human DBRF. Indeed, since 1975, dogs belonging to more than 30
breeds have been responsible for fatal attacks on people, including Dachshunds, a Yorkshire Terrier, and a Labrador Retriever."

One more quote for good measure: "Another concern is that a ban on a specific breed might cause people who want a dangerous dog to simply turn to another breed for the same qualities they sought in the original dog (eg, large size, aggression easily fostered).

http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds.pdf

Next time READ THE REPORT. Don't just splice quotes at random. It is intellectually dishonest and it only makes your argument look weaker.

Once again, a dog is a territorial predator. A predator is one which kills and eats another organism. Left to their own devices a dog will attempt predatory behavior. A responsible owner would prevent this from happening. Exercise, obedience training and consistency are what is needed to suppress the dog's prey drive. I'm assuming the criminal owner, and the 2 parents weren't much for exercise or maintaining discipline. By the way can I borrow your THROUGH-THE-INTERNET-IQ-TEST?

Logic in, "PITBULLS ARE DANGEROUS THEREFORE BAN THEM." It has a premise and a conclusion. I'll skip pointing out that you assume things in your premise, and your lack of a logical form. Also I'm not sure if you know this (can't tell how you'd miss it with such exhausting research) but a pit bull isn't a breed of dog. It is a catch all word used to describe several breeds. I'm sure you knew all of that and were way ahead of me though. As for the pit bull "breed" having "the most negative encounters with humans than any other breed." Do you think it might have something to do with the fact that it is the most popular dog in our country?