Dear Robertson, you may call gay marriage what you want, but your pious words are on the cusp of powerlessness. The gays shall receive their legal equality, under the law, by way of the federal court system. Their private lives shall be insulated from your sexist, intrusive dogma, and you shall be powerless to do anything about it. If you don't like it, you may kiss my middle finger.

I am not religious, whatsoever, but because of idiots like the drunk on god fool we're talking about, I would like to witness the annihilation of Christianity. It has devolved into an offensive, money laundering entity. It deserves spectacular ridicule.

<div class="idc-message" id="idc-comment-msg-div-215005918"><a class="idc-close" title="Click to Close Message" href="javascript: IDC.ui.close_message(215005918)"><span>Close Message</span>

Comment posted.

<p class="idc-nomargin"><a class="idc-share-facebook" target="_new" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fthenewcivilrightsmovement.com%2Fkardashian-divorce-not-gay-marriage-exemplifies-threats-to-marriage%2Fmarriage%2F2011%2F10%2F31%2F29450#IDComment215005918&t=I%20just%20commented%20on%20Kardashian%20Divorce%2C%20Not%20Gay%20Marriage%2C%20Exemplifies%20Threats%20To%20Marriage%20%7C%20The%20New%20Civil%20Rights%20Movement" style="text-decoration: none;"><span class="idc-share-inner"><span>Share on Facebook</span></span> or <a href="javascript: IDC.ui.close_message(215005918)">Close Message

I fully support marriage equality; therefore, I fully support Kim Kardashian and her utilization of divorce. She is not an elected official advocating for anti-gay laws, so she doesn't deserve any scrutiny, whatsoever. She is simply exercising her rights. No matter how you square things off with the anti-gay, Christian corporations, and rub their noses in their pile of shit they've created, they will always hate the gay. Pushing Kim Kardashian in their face is a waste of time (and tarnishing a raging beauty). Kudos to Kim Kardashian for asserting her needs with reckless abandonment. Her divorce has absolutely no effect on anyone's private life. She deserves to marry again, and again and again.

Who appointed this hillbilly to speak for all straight people? The religion of Christian sexism is in the toilet bowl.

Anyone who supports this is an asshole!

New DOMA lawsuit filed in Connecticut filed by a retired, disabled Navy vet married last year in her home state.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/us/denied-veter...

Greedy "gay rights" organization acting as an inverse NOM. http://ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=9777&Medi...

If you don't want your marriage rights voted on don't send them money. Send it to AFER instead!

Anti-gay Christianity is totally fucked up. The Pope is an asshole, and the bible thumping, anti-gay lunatics are hung up to the point of constipation, on everyone's sexuality, but their own. Get a god-damn life!

According to Carol Corrigan, California Supreme Court Justice, yes. She rhetorically asked this question during the initial challenge to proposition 8 in her court. (I think it was her, but maybe it was Kennard.) Conversely, I heard that she is a lesbian and, coincidentally, she was among the dissenters in the 08' marriage cases.

Why would California voters repeal gay marriage when it was a real, tangible practice, and then vote to repeal what they've done?