As someone that makes a living in the photovoltaic field, I agree with you. There are many American companies you can support in the field and perhaps make a little cash while doing so. Among them are ECD (traded on the NASDDAQ) and First solar (I'm not sure where that is traded). As I said I work in the field so I am biased on the company I would suggest so I will suggest none. The more that is channeled into these companies the closer to grid parity we will get, and that is when photvoltaics will pay off.
Just because I support clean energy alternatives does not mean I follow the global warming mantra. I believe that clean air is something we should try to achieve for the sake of clean air.
Well sir, with a concealed permit I can carry with a round in the chamber if I choose.
I am a Michigander sir, and have been trying to convince my state representative to breach the subject.
I have found that liberals are far more likely to name call than conservatives. Labels like ignorant are far more rampant coming from their mouths than conservatives. This is just when you disagree with them, so free thinking that disagrees with liberal thought is ignorance. Now that's just acording to the many liberals that I've disagreed with so often. I'm sure that there are many intelligent liberals out there, ones that can appreciate free thought, ones that question everything ( including the "science" behind global warming). I've just not met one yet.
I seem to be on a Winston Churchill kick today. Oh well.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
You seem to put far to much emphasis on education as a condition of intelligence as well. In reality education only provides you with knowledge, it's the application of that knowledge that indicates intelligence. As far as campuses being full of liberals thus it has been for quite sometime, and will remain so. When department heads surround themselves with like minded individuals what else would you exspect. Just remember with some exceptions, those that can not do teach.
As far as subtely and nuance I prefer the the Winston Churchill aproach.
"If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack."
What you would seem to prefer, by your statement, is something called subterfuge. Yes, that age old tradition of politicians not meaning what they say or changing the meaning of words to conform with what they "ment".
As someone who works in the renewable energy market (the photovoltaic industry), I feel I should say that renewable energy field has not been helped by the less than stimulating "stimulus" package either. As I and my co-workers have all been laid off and have had our hours cut recently. It makes you wonder who is being stimulated by this package? Wow that sounds ahhhhh never mind.
The problem is that the meaning of that sacred scroll has somehow "changed" according to several justices. This is how we end up with Immanent Domain blunders by the Supreme Farce err... court.
The problem is that the meaning of that sacred scroll has somehow "changed" according to several justices. This is how we end up with Immanent Domain blunders by the Supreme Farce err... court.
Back to my point about W being slightly left; the Patriot act is an act of big government (big government= left) as well as his budgets that were enormous (again a trait of the left) the only thing he did with a right lean to it was the invasion of Afghanistan. Now before you try to reply again educate yourself on what it means to be on the left and what it means to be on the right, because you have either been mislead miss-taught or just plain don't comprehend the liberal versus conservative thing
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Ruckus