IntenseDebate - DMoneyX

14 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - ‘The Five’ Reflect... · 0 replies · +8 points

Come on dude, what's your point here? You're trying to be an arse at the wrong time. No reason for this nonsense now. Go see a preacher or rabbi for your answer.

14 years ago @ Big Hollywood - In Memoriam: Andrew Br... · 0 replies · +19 points

Unbelievable. His last Twitter post was 7 hours ago! That was around 2:00 am EST. I can't believe it :-(.

RIP my friend. Thank you for everything you have done and the fight you endured. You will be missed!

14 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Sheriff Babeu Comes Ou... · 0 replies · +1 points

Like Harley_Charley said, there wasn't any proof for your original comment. You really just threw that out there. I always give credit where credit is due and this Sheriff came right out there and told the truth, unlike most public figures.

On top of that, there was never any hate spouted by him, so he seems to be a class act in my opinion. No one is perfect though, but at least this guy was completely honest about his private life.

14 years ago @ Big Journalism - EXCLUSIVE: Big Journal... · 1 reply · +3 points

You don't understand. Breitbart and other conservatives in general are held to a standard that no one else, including other journalists, are held to. If he didn't redact more than the police, then libs would attack Breitbart for not redacting.

Even you are not arguing the substance of the report and the fact that rapes did occur, but instead are debating on how there was too much redacting. So either they could have redacted less and faced scrutiny of exposing too much information and thus libs missing the big picture, or face criticisms like yours where he redacted too much. It's a no win situation with most libs, but the smart ones will look past the nonsense.

14 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Sheriff Babeu Comes Ou... · 3 replies · +1 points

I apologize, but where in these articles is Sheriff Babeu? Maybe I missed something here, but is there anything in these articles that speak specifically about him? You mentioned that Sheriff Babeu spoke specifically about hate, and I don't see anything with him in your examples. You made a very specific attack against him and was wondering where that originated. Did I miss it in your example or are you being broad based in your assessment?

14 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Sheriff Babeu Comes Ou... · 0 replies · +3 points

You realize Weiner lied right? That was the reason he got booted.

14 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Sheriff Babeu Comes Ou... · 5 replies · +4 points

What hate did he spout? Do you have proof or just make it up?

14 years ago @ Big Journalism - Keith Olbermann Now DE... · 2 replies · +15 points

You do understand that liberals made up stories about the Tea Party being racist and now that liberals have been caught red handed with rapes, vandalism, threats, thievery, etc., that now has forced you to change how you attack other Americans?

Instead of falsifying stories, you are forced to find any small infraction by anyone claiming to be involved with the Tea Party outside of Tea Party rallies to try to pin that action onto that group, that by large, were very peaceful in their protest. In fact all your "examples" are by an individuals, and if true, will not be protected by any Tea Party member, whilst the OWS people, libs, and the MSM will protect the rapists and thugs within OWS. I could also show you 10 times the amount of thuggery stories with OWS than was ever at a Tea Party rally.

I doubt you'll ever see the difference because of your ideology. Every day I try to challenge mine personal beliefs as to not be blinded, so someday I hope you do the same.

14 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Brandon Darby Confront... · 1 reply · +10 points

The question should be is he "Right or Wrong". People were going to commit a crime, sounds like a heinous one at that, and he stopped it. That's the right thing to do in my book.

14 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Breitbart Contributor ... · 1 reply · +6 points

I agree with your last statement in that it does not absolve or indicts anyone, but the reason this video is important is because the protesters are chanting that CPAC is racist, without proof, and here is a guy to refute that claim.

The protesters could have been paid too, and from another video, it looks like some of them were paid. In any case, if someone is going to make a claim of racism and then there's a guy that says otherwise, then we need to take at face value what's he is saying, if accusations without proof are being made.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with DMoneyX

People I'm following

DMoneyX