![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
CrochetMom
30p15 comments posted · 0 followers · following 1
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/20/09 - 3/24/09 · 0 replies · +1 points
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/13 - 3/25 · 0 replies · +1 points
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/13 - 3/25 · 0 replies · +1 points
State Governments Knew This Was Coming
In early February nine U.S. States began the process of re-asserting their Sovereignty pursuant to the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the US Constitution; declaring null and void any actions by Congress that violated the Constitution.
At the time, I wrote about those state efforts ( Here) and wondered why so many states were taking-up such an arcane issue in such a seemingly urgent fashion. I guess now, we know why. The states were obviously privy to what the feds were planning to do with granting Eminent Domain to China. The states took action to make certain the feds couldn't give away cities or the states themselves! This situation is going to get VERY ugly, VERY fast as one sovereign power (the feds) try to literally give away the land of other sovereign powers, (the states). This is the type of thing that starts Civil Wars.
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/13 - 3/25 · 1 reply · +1 points
People who live in those states and own their land outright, might be able to negotiate with China to "rent" back their own property, as long as they continue to pay all their taxes (to China) ; but the land and buildings would belong to China! This is what our own Government has just done to us and it is the single most vile act of betrayal in the history of human existence.
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/13 - 3/25 · 2 replies · +1 points
With the stroke of a Chinese chop stick, Hawaii and California -- all the land and buildings in those states -- are now owned by China. The "taking" would be a "valid public use" because it was "taken" in payment of the public debt!
China could then turn around and declare the value of all that land to be worth. . . . . I dunno, ten cents on a dollar? If you own a $200,000 house in either state, you get a Chinese check for $20,000. Needless to say, the property owners would go ballistic and demand "just compensation" for what was taken. Who gets to decide what is "just?" China! Don't think you got a fair price for what they took? No problem, sue China. You'll lose.
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/13 - 3/25 · 3 replies · +1 points
FEDS GRANT EMINENT DOMAIN AS COLLATERAL TO CHINA FOR U.S. DEBTS! Part 3
Who decides what constitutes "just compensation?" The government! In past "takings" homeowners who felt the government was not paying them enough for property have filed lawsuits. In absolutely every such case, the value placed upon the property by the government was upheld by the courts. Our federal government has now granted to China, this power to "take" our homes and businesses in the event the US Gov't defaults on its debts.
Let's play this out as a worst case scenario. . . . . .
The US Gov't goes belly-up and China comes in and says, "they owed us $700 Billion in Treasury Notes and another $2 Trillion in actual cash money which is now worthless. We are taking the entire state of Hawaii and the entire state of California in lieu of this bad debt. "
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/13 - 3/25 · 4 replies · +1 points
FEDS GRANT EMINENT DOMAIN AS COLLATERAL TO CHINA FOR U.S. DEBTS! Part 2
This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities - to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government. Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt. This is an unimaginable betrayal of every man, woman and child in the USA. An outrage worthy of violent overthrow. Eminent Domain is the power of government to TAKE private property for public use without the consent of the property owner. Under our Constitution, the government can only "take" when providing "just compensation" for what they've taken.
Part 3 next.
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/13 - 3/25 · 5 replies · +1 points
Can anyone help me verify or deny or at least give me a suggestion on where to do more research on it. I DON"T KNOW IF IT'S TRUE and want to make sure before I start talking to immediate friends and family, as Glenn suggests.
Here it is --
TO ALL WHO RECEIVE THIS FROM US WE RECEIVED IT FROM RON CRANE, IDAHO STATE TREASURER
FEDS GRANT EMINENT DOMAIN AS COLLATERAL TO CHINA FOR U.S. DEBTS!
Beijing, China -- The United States Government of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves! On February 11, Bloomberg Business News reported that China was seeking "guarantees" for its US Government debt ( Story Here and below), and it now appears they got it. Well placed senior sources at the US Embassy in Beijing CONFIRM the formal written agreement was delivered by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her recent trip to China.
Part 2 next
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/13 - 3/25 · 0 replies · +4 points
You can take my gun -- when you step over my cold dead body -- but not until then. - MIssouri CrochetMom
17 years ago @ Glenn Beck - The 912 P... - 3/20/09 - 3/24/09 · 0 replies · +1 points
To be honest. I do not know 1 person/1 family that does not have some form of health care. Not in my church, my family, any of my places of work - a school, craft shows etc. I DO know there are people without health care. I remember, when I worked for a major University that the Graduate Teaching and Graduate Research Assistants were not offered insurace, so many went without. When it was offered nearly all of them took it, but a few decided that they were healthy and careful and just kept their money. So I am beginning to think that the number of uninsured may be quite inflated. Somewhat like in the 80's when they were talking about the numbers of the homeless and I knew that I had family members who were being counted in that group, but they had jobs part-time jobs etc and while they didn't have an actual home address they were living a lifestyle of RVing full-time on the road, where they wanted to be and when they wanted to be there. They were not living in shelters etc, they were quite well to do.
Experiment