A pic of Andrew,mimicking the famous Che t-shirts, with an American flag on his beret instead of the commie star and underneath the words:

We need one, two, many, Breitbarts

I will always remember how fearlessly and fiercely he fought for the truth. He was a good man, a proud patriot, a happy warrior and a brother-in-arms. Even though I never met or spoke with him I feel like I have lost a family member today. We will carry on the fight and we will win.
Goodnight, Andrew.

What I posted at the Blaze in reply to Mr. Scarry's blog:

Perhaps Mr. Beck’s highly paid EIC is just dropping the ball here. I was a front page editor once so let me constructively edit your analysis since at present your and the “others” perception are neither objective nor accurate.
“For Newsweek, Santorum’s family troubles relate to Sarah Palin

What’s the first thing that came to mind when you heard that Rick Santorum‘s special needs child was in the hospital with pneumonia late last month? I bet all of Mitt Romney‘s money it wasn’t Sarah Palin unless you are Newsweek.
“Newsweek,” a magazine who loves to hate Palin knows her name gets attention and they need some. They asked her to ever so delicately tie her experience raising her son Trig, who has Down syndrome, to Santorum whose daughter Bella was born with Trisomy 18, a disability similar to Down syndrome.”

I’ll be expecting a check in the mail and you are welcome.
Mr. Beck, you have some very thoughtless people writing for you and they will attract a like minded Movement

There was such a rush to get this smear out there that the snarky headline even contradicts the article’s words

“Somehow, Santorum’s family troubles relate to Sarah Palin”
vs.

“Palin tied her experience raising her son Trig, who has Down syndrome, to Santorum.”

“Santorum[s] daughter Bella who was born with Trisomy 18, [has] a disability similar to Down syndrome.”

Why was the “Somehow” necessary Mr. Scarry? Please tell us what your agenda is, if it is not the truth.

3) Unlike my perception, Mr. Scarry and “others” had the following perception of these events:

“What’s the first thing that came to mind when you heard that Rick Santorum‘s special needs child was in the hospital with pneumonia late last month? … it wasn’t Sarah Palin unless you are Sarah Palin.”

4) Mr. Scarry then counts some words in her article and dutifully reports them as important but fails to present the “cause” from whence this whole effect came. (Reminds me of when the Left says Reagan was for raising taxes and amnesty, but leave out the cause – that Reagan was lied to and promised spending cuts and closed borders by the Dems)

Which suggests to me that Scarry and “others” and I‘m assuming the EIC have a such a low perception of Palin that they could care less about researching basic facts when a hit piece is a waitin’.

“This post was a brief analysis of the perception I, among others, had of Palin contributing to a magazine she regularly criticizes.”

So lets get this straight:
1) Palin criticized a magazine in the past for unfair reporttage.
2) The magazine, instead of just writing their analysis of their perception of how Palin feels about raising a special needs child, asks her to write something in her own words about her own child, so she is able to speak directly to an audience who has only heard the “other half” about her and her family

I posted this on The Blaze in response to Mr. Scarry''s blog:
I have heard you say, Mr. Beck, that you are putting all of your money into this venture – why are you wasting money paying a man to unfairly and malignantly ridicule Palin or do you not consider it a waste? Would that money not be better spent informing the public against political hack jobs like this one instead of funding it? Perhaps you should better define your Movement and hire people who are up to the task.

An honest title for this blog would have been: “Somehow, Eddie Scarry’s derangement relates to Sarah Palin, and Glenn Beck pays good money for it”

I posted this on The Blaze in reply to Mr. Scarry's blog

“The Truth has no agenda” – but Eddie Scarry and The Blaze Editor-in-Chief sure do.
I had once believed this site was striving to be objective and accurate, now it isn’t even shooting for “fair and balanced.”
Mr. Scarry is one of those “too cool for Palin” types, who also doesn’t mind calling someone a whore on twitter….so…
Mr. Beck you have said you wanted to lead a movement, & that your fans would be the ones to right this Republic, but look at the bottom feeder you have hired in Mr. Scarry. Will his slanted and biased “blogging” attract more fans to your Movement or will it turn them off? Is he representative of the Movement you want to lead or are you wasting our precious time? How many Tea Partiers would join your Movement, with a smear merchant who is paid by you, spewing agitprop at a well-thought-of figure in the TP movement?

So in whose establishment would you eat?

Amen