Remember, during the Bush administration "dissent was patriotic".

Now? Not so much.

Sure it is. Go watch The Simpsons sometime. :)

Quite rightly!

Isn't it amazing how people will listen to someone's voice and, if it doesn't sound "normal", they immediately think the messenger is stupid? If, for example, Dr. Martin Luther King had a stutter, would you think he was stupid and his message was meaningless?

There's the difference - Obama has a nice speaking voice, but we listen to what he's saying...and we know he's wrong.

Not sure this was an improvement on last year, when Hillary saw her shadow and we got six more months of campaigning.

"Is next - day vear! Very nice! Is next - evening vear! Very nice!"

And the granddaddy of them all - Dragnet.

Saw this movie on good old ON TV when I was in high school. Turned out a varsity B-Ball-playing buddy of mine has also seen it. We used to greet each other with "hey, Bob-BY" and "hey, Dav-EY" for the rest of the year.

The point remains - if it's so bad to use taxpayer money to honor a banker's contract with a buy-out, why is it okay to use taxpayer money to honor an entertainer's contract with a buy-out?

Personally, I feel that if it's in the contract it should be honored. I don't care if it's a banker or whoever. If it turns out to be a costly deal then it's not the fault of the individual, it's the fault of the corporation.

1. Remember, to liberals it's only sex. Doesn't mean anything.
2. Then they sign up for more government aid when they find out how tough it is to raise a child. I mean, look at these kids in that video - can they really handle the responsibility of bringing a child into the world?
3. See #2.