Shame on you, Chuck Todd. How dare you call yourself a "reporter." You're just another Obama shill.
I have to assume Dr. Ablow is spewing that BS because it makes for better television than saying, 'hey, the guy's bipolar, his brain chemicals are out of wack. He just needs some lithium or Depakote." Sometimes the "manic" part of bipolar disorder involves paranoia and psychotic thinking, in addition to the typical grandiosity. And voila, right-wing snipers. Brock appears to be a classic bipolar.
Dr. Ablow, Dr. Phil, Dr. Drew, Dr. Joyce Brothers, TV whores all.
Yeah, what's the deal with that smile? She's just a horrible horrible person.
LadyLiberty, I second that! If he were running for President, on election day I would actually be voting FOR him instead of just against Obama. Since I can't do that, I really hope the Republican nominee is smart enough to pick West for VP. And then I would hope West isn't another one of those "ladies' man" types with white (or black!) female skeletons in his closet.
I'm sorry, but it sounded to me like they were having audio difficulties and nothing more. I haven't read all 148 comments, but I can't believe no one else has gotten this same impression. There's no "bleeping" of words; there's just big chunks without the audio, including of the other people talking.
My God, Richmond's administration has balls! The arrogance! Unbelievable. Go Tea Party, go!!!
Someone should tell Maxine Waters that if she's going to sleep with her wig on, she should fluff it out in the morning so it won't be flat in the back!
Oooh, yes I did!
Jeannie, as a high-ranking grammar nit-picker, I must say that the grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling in your posts is superior to virtually every other blog writer on the Big sites PLUS American Thinker, American Spectator, etc. I see so many "flubs" in other writers' work it's not even funny, and I'm talking about major so-called "professional" writers whose names I will not list because I don't want to get banned. The fact is that "could care less," although not technically correct, is used in everyday conversation all the time. It's nowhere near as "offensive" an error as using "it's" for the possessive "its" or "there" instead of "their," which I see all the time in these blogs. They should all look into this high-tech method I heard about, it's called "proofreading." Jeannie, I can tell you're a talented user of this very effective method! So I say, kudos to you! Don't let the bastards get you down.
I'm over here rolling my eyes...this Matthews geezer is a right bell end, innit!
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Experiment