Finally, some intelligent commentary. Why are we shooting the messenger? Just because he's a liberal bum? There are likely hundreds of journalists, authors, and writers who have agendas of their own, entirely likely the vast majority are leftist. Given the same opportunity to have access to the general and his staff as this guy did, they would write and release the same information. Its not like he made up a bunch of stuff. McChrystal and his staff did not deny a single item, or even suggest they were taken out of context. If the Rolling Stone writer held back the quotes or story out of some misguided sense of patriotism, that would be an epic fail.

Thanks for leaving out Cars, it is the most blatant rip off of Doc Hollywood.

You saved a special spot for the grand prize winner - that's the only conceivable reason you left out UP.

State run media is not really accurate. See China for a real example of state run media. MS, owned by Microsoft, and NBC, owned by GE are still public companies. CNN is owned by Timewarner. FoxNews by News Corp., you the idea.

Just because two out of three choose to be aligned with the administration at the cost of their integrity, and actively promote D-agenda does not mean they receive marching orders from the government. That would take away from their culpability. Unless you're a conspiracy theorist, one incident at MSNBC with their talking points does not change this fact, though imagine the public uproar if this was regular policy.

I think poorly of both CCN and Spitzer, one is a conniving liberal, and the other used to extort legitimate businesses with the overreaching power of the state.

That said, let's not forget Fox News gave Oliver North his own show. Wait, you like Oliver, so that doesn't bug you? Sorry, I'm not a hypocrite.