Al_Kanadi
-1p4 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - In conversation with M... · 0 replies · -2 points
13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - In conversation with M... · 0 replies · -2 points
Mia: “It’s justifying within a religious frame the killing of other Muslims, which is completely against the Koran”. Kate: Are they (female suicide bombers whose missions failed) rejected by their communities? Mia explains no, the community would understand if the prospective bomber were pre-empted or if the device failed to go off and would be rejected only if she backed out. Then she gives the example of a “very religious Muslim girl” who changed her mind because she didn’t want to get “tarted-up”. So if this violence is not legitimate as ‘expert’ Mia tells us, why do Muslim communities reject those whose conscience makes them back out of suicide bombing yet understand if circumstances beyond the prospective bomber’s control lead to failure? And how could, (if “the Koran is completely against” this), “a very religious Muslim” girl consider bombing right up until the time she was asked to “tart-up”?
13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - Taliban kills 10 medic... · 1 reply · -2 points
Thank allah for moderates!
13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - Learning Islamic finance · 0 replies · 0 points
and you’ll find that this means “buy arms or some other supplies related to the war effort, Zakat money should be used provided the effort is to raise the banner of Islam.”
Scratch the surface and everything associated with “Sharia” is retrograde and should have no place in the west. Shame on the U of T.