43245

43245

-46p

107 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - Oh the irony. Samsung ... · 0 replies · +1 points

Hey I've got a great idea, I'm going to sue someone then I'm going to pay him so he can use my money to defend himself in court and lodge countersuits

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - iPhone 4 'Antenna-gate... · 0 replies · +1 points

Uh Oh... Tallest_Skil is going to keep arguing with you. Wait, whats that he stopped spouting inane drivel and moved on? Surely that can't be right. He is NEVER wrong!

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - iPhone 4 'Antenna-gate... · 0 replies · -1 points

It's because that new iPhone is so reflective and pretty it blinds them to anything except feeling like a better person than anyone who doesn't have one, whether they wanted one or not.

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - iPhone 4 'Antenna-gate... · 0 replies · 0 points

iSheeple do lots of funny things, let him have his delusions. Getting the next iPad will probably cure cancer and make beer taste better and contain no calories where he lives too.

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - IDC says Apple finishe... · 0 replies · -2 points

The drive for any business is ultimately making the most money possible, Apple does do a good job of maximizing profits on the market share they ALREADY have, but you're deluding yourself if you think that Apple wouldn't love to have more market share and actively moves to acheive that goal, as its primary goal.

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - Apple becomes the top ... · 0 replies · -1 points

Interestingly the military is trusting their secrets to "secured Android" phones. Granted you probably won't find Android Market access on them but still its interesting

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - Apple becomes the top ... · 1 reply · -2 points

You do realize that you contridicted your own argument right? "Apple products don't exist to beat other companies" that part is fine fine in and of itself. However, since your next 2 sentences spell out that Apple wants market share and profits (which are attained by having a better product than a competitior) you have basically both made a statement and proved it wrong in less than 80 words.

Ultimately you have to be able to make a case that Apple is trying to market a clearly inferior product in order for your argument to stand up. You can't do that and I don't foresee a time when you will be able to, so go sit in the corner while people who are able to have a coherent conversation do so in peace.

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - IDC says Apple finishe... · 2 replies · -2 points

You're suggesting that market share which equals money is not the primary concern of an American business? Do you ride a unicorn to work?

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - Google poaches Apple's... · 0 replies · +1 points

Apple takes someone elses employee and it "taps" that person. Google takes Apple's employee and its "poaching". Obvious double standards are awesome.

14 years ago @ 9 to 5 Mac | Apple Int... - Apple forced to remove... · 0 replies · +1 points

Apple breaks the law in Germany and its Germanys fault? Seriously? It doesn't matter how stupid you or I think the law is, Apple is bound to comply with that the same as everyone else when they choose to sell their products there. They have a horde of lawyers who really should have been able to see this coming, and maybe they did, but somewhere someone decided to go ahead and sell the products in question in Germany, despite German law. Sounds like APPLES fault to me.