IntenseDebate - whitedragonawa

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 1 reply · +1 points

ya I would but the bible is accurate to history and archeology and has been proven as true. All the cities nations people and activities were real and happened. They have found all kinds of evidence for buildings and rulers it talks about as existing and interacting with the jews.
the book of mormon does not.

If you said the bible teaches us to kill buddhists and you use a verse about killing false worshipers of idols like marduk, baal, molech etc during the time of the Israaelite theocracy, and I use verses to prove you wrong about loving enemies and preaching repentence and faith this is not circular reasoning. If the atheist says "You cant use the bible to defend this!" then he is committing the fallacy chad is talking about.

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 1 reply · +1 points

If I used exitinction to defend the bible thats not at all saying im ONLY using external evidence. All you said is a Christian MUST believe in fire breathing dragons. I simply said it was not true that they MUST believe they currently exist.

Of course another photograph missing trotsky would not be good evidence. This is not the point of what we are talking about. The bible is not a photograph and contains a lot of information written down.

What you are doing is making smoke screens. Now answer the question about Chad's article.

Can you give an example of Chad's article where reductio ad absurdem goes against what Chad calls a fallacy?

and not answering the question about using the Bible.

If someone attacks THE BIBLE by using a verse from the bible and I counter argue it by using another verse to prove them wrong is that legitimate argumentation? Why or why not? This is not saying that the verses teach opposite things, but that obviously the atheist randomly pulled a verse out of context to make a point thats not true with the bible.

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 1 reply · +1 points

You dont understand how the bible is used to defend itself. And the bible does not contain faulty information and it is true on all pages. History confirms this as well as archelogy and more. Please enlighten me on where the bible makes such a mistake as the one you are suggesting.

If the bible does not at all contradict itself and someone uses something in the bible to attack it and I use the bible to defend his attacl then I am doing legitimate argumentation. The bible does not contradict itself or contain any errors so my argumentation is legit. You are wrong.

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 6 replies · +1 points

A person to believe the bible does not have to currrently believe in fire breathing monsters existing today in order to understand its truth. Your example is insufficient and you also did not use any content from Chad's article to prove your point. You just rambled on about newtonians physics.

If someone attacks THE BIBLE by using a verse from the bible and I counter argue it by using another verse to prove them wrong that is legitimate argumentation on my part.

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 1 reply · -1 points

This is question begging epithet. You have nothing to say that matters.

In the Bible Cain had a wife and had children. His wife was NOT Eve because Eve was with Adam and their geneology is listed as well.

Cain had to have a wife from someone else. So obvious it had to be a sister. This is logic man. Get a clue. You are the true mental walrus. I am done wasting time with you.

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 8 replies · +1 points

Can you give an example of Chad's article where reductio ad absurdem goes against what Chad calls a fallacy?

So you are saying if you claim Chad's idea that someone cannot argue a point about the bible using the bible and also reject a persons answer if he uses the bible to answer it; its circular reasoning? Can you give an example of why?

Cause it seems you are just saying random stuff and trying to sound smart.

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 3 replies · +2 points

Again I repeat:

Is Chad's content about an atheist using the Bible to attack someone who believes in the Bible, and when that bible believer uses the Bible back at the atheist to answer his objection, the atheist rejects his answer because he used the bible logical?

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 3 replies · 0 points

How did I invent it?

So who did Cain have sex with? can you tell me?

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 1 reply · 0 points

No because no one makesup logic. Logic exists in itself. It is a law. Logic is self evident and no one can add or take away from that. Just because you claim Chad made something up does not mean you are right.

13 years ago @ StreetApologetics - What is the Taxi-Cab F... · 5 replies · -1 points

So do you think you are super smart? Or do you admit you are not super smart?

A logical point does not have to be written down in an academic journal or online philosophical resource for the concept to exist.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with whitedragonawa

People I'm following

whitedragonawa