aml_reads
40p3 comments posted · 2 followers · following 0
13 years ago @ Poverty Insights - Why is Building Afford... · 0 replies · +3 points
13 years ago @ http://www.colusa-sun-... - Workshop on charter ci... · 0 replies · +2 points
As for the claim that without PW everyone can bid, that's actually an upside down claim. When projects have PW requirements all it mandates is that the competition is determined based on management quality and productivity, rather than how much someone can drive down wages. No-one is restricted from bidding a PW job except those disbarred by the state or public agency. What researchers and successful public works officials have seen is that eliminating prevailing wages actually restricts the bidding pool because lots of contractors won't touch those jobs for the simple reason that in a "lowest bid" environment the low-ball contractor has every incentive to put in a low bid to win the work then hit rack up costs on the back end or delay the project. Since submitting a bid costs money, good contractors don't even want to take that risk. Gilroy's public works director speaks about this at length at this link.
http://gilroy.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_i...
13 years ago @ http://www.colusa-sun-... - Colusa to consider cha... · 0 replies · +4 points
here's the math: labor and fringes typically make up less than a quarter of construction costs. the advertised savings is mathematically impossible unless the workers actually pay their boss for the privilege of a job. in reality prevailing wages do not run up the cost of construction but instead promote increased productivity and local economic development. the research is virtually unanimous on this score.
check out <a href="http://www.smartcitiesprevail.org" target="_blank">www.smartcitiesprevail.org to find out more