Anderson also might be holding back on re-signing and getting deep into negotiations until his children (twins) are born. I'm not saying that is the case, but maybe he's not wanting to re-sign and get back into the thick of things until then. Hopefully he'll be back though.

"He noted that he is the only one left from the Nashville days" - Poor James Storm, LOL.

I don't believe there is anything going on between Jarrett/TNA. It's been said before that he still works in the offices in Nashville and he's been stopping by the warehouse (for ShopTNA) to sign autographs for the website. Doesn't sound like bad blood to me.

Personally, seems the Hall of Fame is there way to give WWE the finger and say: "Ha! We put Sting and Angle in before you could!". Just my two cents.

He has been to eighteen events total - three of those eighteen are pay-per-views - in five states. He's not saying he's been to three pay-per-views in five states, but 18 events in five states. Make sense?

Joy, It's another TNA concept that has been killed off.

I do not understand how Aries brought TNA - or whatever - into the "mainstream media". There is a difference between mainstream media and pro-wrestling media, a very big difference.

They don't run in the Northeast a lot? There was a time period that TNA pretty much lived in the NE with live events...

I can't believe that popularity is being judged on the amount of t-shirts a superstar has had made.

I don't really care about who didn't watch Styles/Daniels, the issue I take is that they want to puff out their chest and proclaim themselves unbiased reviewers. You aren't an "unbiased reviewer" when you are boycotting a 25-30 minute [whatever it was] part of a show. It is like reviewing a movie and yet fast forwarding through 10 minutes of a movie because you don't like actor so-and-so. That isn't given an "unbiased review"... because you're missing 10 minutes of a movie. In this case, they're missing 25-30 minutes of a pay-per-view and then want to grade it. You can't give a show a 5.5/10 rating [or ANY rating] when you didn't watch the entire show. Okay, you can do that... but don't proclaim yourself "unbiased" because you obviously have bias when you are "boycotting" a certain match. The attitude of "didn't watch, didn't care" is the wrong approach toward a review.

Anyone read the "About" page? There's this comment: "TNAsylum focuses on both the behind-the-scenes news and rumors of TNA but also stresses the importance of accentuating the on-screen product as well."

I don't see how you stress the importance of the on-screen product, when people that write/make videos for your website... contradicts that by saying, "didn't watch, didn't care" regarding a pro-wrestling match. There are great writers on this website and I feel the attitude shown with this ["didn't wtach, didn't care"] contradicts the entire point of the website. I don't want people to fake smile and say they liked something, but watch the whole show and form your opinion. If you aren't willing to watch the ENTIRE show... then don't call yourself an "unbiased reviewer".

*steps off soapbox*

Lucha Libre USA also ran the Isslusions Theatre. They had a nice set-up [stage and ring wise], so there is zero reasons TNA couldn't run it.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4ZZuj3AKdjo/T7E-YBbNgxI/AAAAAAAAEPs/rGQRKu2921I/s1600/5.JPG

There is MORE than enough space for lights, barridacde, the annouonce table, etc. They will put the cage up, keep it up, and then the show ends. It's not like they only run 1-2 cage matches and have to put it back up and down.