IntenseDebate - skedster

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 1 reply · 0 points

Hahahaha. Yung post mo puro kababoyan. Na-aaddict ka na yata sa kababoyan mo Kiko. Na address na lahat ng mga false propaganda mo, kaya kung gusto mo magbabad dyan sa mga sinasabi mong puro kababuyan, sarilinin mo na lang okey. Kaya nga sabi ko sayo hindi ka pinapakialaman huwag mo na rin pakialaman ang iba. Kung madumi at puro kababuyan ang laman ng isip mo, sarilinin mo na lang, nandadamay ka pa. Hahahaha. Salamat uli, pinatawa mo na naman ako ng husto.

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 1 reply · 0 points

How very logical and very correct Kiko. Hahahaha. Thanks for another laugh.

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 0 replies · 0 points

From the NSCB: A Brief Description of the Methodology for the 2000 Census-Based Population Projections http://www.nscb.gov.ph/resolutions/2006/7Annex.pdf

"For future trends of fertility for the country as a whole, three assumptions were made based on the time when replacement-level fertility, that is, NRR=1.0 will be attained. For the LOW series (rapid pace of fertility decline), NRR=1.0 was targeted for the year 2030. For the MEDIUM series (moderate pace of fertility decline), NRR=1 was targeted for the year 2040 and for the HIGH series (slow pace of fertility decline), NRR=1.0 by 2050. The TFRs in Table 3 were projected to follow an exponential growth curve to the year 2040. The 2003 NDHS age pattern of fertility was assumed to be the same up to the year 2040."

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 3 replies · 0 points

Kiko,

Kung gusto mo mag-anak ng mag-anak ng parang BABOY, gawin mo. Pero huwag mo ipilit gawin ang pag-anak mo ng parang BABOY sa mga taong gusto magcontrol ng size ng pamilya at dami ng anak nila.

Kababuyan ba kapag gustong tulungan ang nangangailangan? Kababuyan ba kapag tinuruan mo ang mga nangangailangan ng impormasyon na makakatulong sa kanila?

Alin at sino ang mas baboy: ang nagbibigay ng impormasyon at binibigyan ng karapatan ang mga tao para sila ang mamili sa sarili nila, o ang mga nagmamagaling na nagsasabi na ang gusto lang nila ang tama at ang dapat masunod sa lahat ng tao?

Kung gusto ng mga tao na magtalik sila, maski madalas, eh gawin nila. Kung ayaw mo huwag mo gawin. Hindi ka pinapakialaman, huwag mo rin pakialaman ang iba. Tolerance ang tawag diyan. Kung gusto ng taong bayan na mag-abot ng tulong sa mga taong nangangailangan, huwag mo na rin pakialaman. Dahil kapag pinipigilan mo ang pag-abot ng tulong sa iba, nagmumukha kang madamot at sugapa, at ang mga taong sugapa kahit saan mo tignan eh mukhang BABOY.

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 3 replies · 0 points

"I was just happy to oblige. Parang kailangan mo kasi ng reassurance after our debates. Hahaha "

Reassurance? From you? Hahaha. Thanks, but no thanks. I've already got all the reassurance I need.

-----------------------

"Actually you already did many times. Kaya nga I had to acknowledge. "

What can I say, I tried to stay away but it's always hard to resist a good laugh. Hahaha. Don't mistake it for being "smitten" though, "entertained" is the more apt way of putting it.

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 5 replies · +4 points

"Nag bolahan pa yung 2 pro rh propagandists. hahahaha "

How predictable. Hehehehe. Thanks for the laughs Kiko. And no need to get too jealous. I'm sure sometime, somewhere may papansin din sayo.

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 11 replies · +6 points

Not sure, but yes I'm grateful for him somewhat. I always enjoy our little "debates", if that's what it can be called, what with the endless repetitions with very little real arguments.

It's great meeting you in these threads too Basti2682, I believe this is the first time we've crossed. Knowing how "tolerant" Kiko is, he will probably brand this as "bolahan" but hey, I sincerely and deeply appreciate all who continue to fight for RH. Cheers to you too and God bless you.

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 1 reply · 0 points

I had a lot of fun too Kiko. Thank you and cheers to you.

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 0 replies · +4 points

Hehehehe, cute. As I said Kiko, I'll let you be. Let's be objective and leave it to those who will read our posts to judge who is winning in the debates, shall we? I'm confident enough about the intelligence of most Pinoys. That aside, I also had fun debating with you. Thank you for your time. I'm sure we'll cross again somewhere in these comments.

As I said, for now I leave you to your fantasies. Enjoy.

13 years ago @ Inquirer Opinion - RH research findings d... · 5 replies · +4 points

Part 2
“Typical catholic thinking, as if it's not enough that you have set back the Filipino people to medieval times, parang gusto mo pa maging anarchy tayo ah..” As I said, I've attacked the church based on what they've done, and I can back these up and can be a subject of a separate debate if you wish. Unlike you na tinatawag na PAMBABABOY ang paggamit ng condoms and IUD, attacking people and branding them as animals not because of what they do to the country or to anybody, but simply because of their preferred family planning method.

You hypocrite. Puro ka satsat about good moral values, mukhang kailangan maturuan ka uli. You're arrogant and selfishness in attacking and denying help to those with UNMET needs is simply DISGUSTING.

TOLERANCE. Live and let live. Try it out sometime, it might do you some good.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with skedster

People I'm following

skedster