Diversity has been elevated as a value that exceeds competency.

The basic problem that prevents numerical agreement between proportions of officers and enlisted men is cognitive ability. Testing uniformly approximates the median American black intelligence level as 85, while the median white intelligence level is 100. The distribution of candidates qualifying for officer's positions is disparate as there is approximately a one sigma difference in distribution. There are simply not a sufficient number of blacks who qualify.

Since diversity is "the overriding value," the only reasonable solution is to lower standards and make the military far less competent. Of course, all Americans will accept this outcome because we have become suicidal idiots.

The military is possibly the most politically correct organization in the U.S. as the bureaucracy acts in conformity with whatever is needed to advance a career. If the preferred appearance were to have a tulip tattooed on your left cheek, the officer's corps would comply.

I was in a TD unit. The commanding officer, a Colonel, was a falling down drunk, a sot who got swacked at the officer's club every night without fail. I would be in his office every morning and he would be nursing a hangover with his head in his hands and his elbows on his desk.. He had a drunk's red face and bulbous nose. We were stationed overseas. The younger officer's emulated him every evening. He would be served "waterfalls," but they were not. As a result, we were up to our ankles in puke in the BOQ every morning. When this Colonel was replaced, the replacement was a Colonel who had two drinks each evening, no more, no fewer. All of these younger officers immediately changed their drinking habits and limited themselves to two drinks, no more, no fewer.

This is an example of adherence to dictates from above. If a person in higher rank in the hierarchy indicates a viewpoint is desirable, the sheep will eruditely indicate that the position is merited. These folks have no character. the military has been screwed up by politically correct conformity, and the direction is to make it worse. Imagine a country led by a black leadership. Look at the ragtail armies in Africa as an example.

Departure from an attempt to be the best it can be is suicidal and will result in unnecessary deaths, and undoubtedly defeats. The Chinese are not the idiots that we are, who pretend that there is value in denying differences. Our military has followed nature and to an extent self-assembled itself based on its available resources.

I really wonder what the value of a woman or a black being installed in a higher rank is compared to maintaining an efficient military. Our military is already compromised, and the Obama wants to make it worse. It is a house of cards that will fall.

Well, Islam is subordinate to the musings of its clerics. When theocracies or religious beliefs control governments or populations, there is repression since "the truth" is in possession of the authorities.

We have had the same problem in the West, where Bruno was burned at stake for proclaiming his view that we lived in a heliocentric and not a geocentric universe. The Catholic Church in its infinite wisdom garnered from rumination on the Scriptures and suppression of gnostic thought, and the adoption by vote of Bishops of the Council of Nicea, was informed by revelation that the idea that the Earth revolved around the sun couldn't be true, and that the Earth was the center of the solar system and universe. They knew because God told them so. To dissent was heresy.

And then the Protestants under Calvin in Geneva burned Servetus at stake because he questioned Trinitarian Doctrine, which also had been adopted by the Bishops assembled, and so contained inerrant truth by revelation to those worthies. To dissent was heresy.

Maybe the problem is that when any form of doctrinaire religion whose beliefs are based on revelation by an inerrant supreme being is in control and empirical evidence is relegated to meaninglessness since God or Allah in Islam is the source and repository of all truth and sets all values, then there is suppression of all thought that is counter to the revelations of the supreme being.

Of course, efforts to install secularism in areas which worship Allah have failed. Even the Turks have backslid from the secular governance installed there by Kemal Ataturk. Eventually, the illiterate or semi-literate populations of the Middle East resort to the wisdom contained in their book, the Quran, to provide answers for all mankind's questions.

How can the Islamic "man on the street" be alienated from the beguiling lure of a religion which promises "pie in the sky when you die by and by," when there is no prospect of redress on Earth. There is recourse to the delusion that somewhere in the future there will be a good life (if that's what they call it) in Paradise. Unfortunately among the Islamics you need "creds" to get into Paradise, and those credits are basically earned by harming others in the effort to spread Islam so that a Caliphate is established and the world lives under the strictures of sharia law, which is primitive and barbaric.

Oh well, never mind. You won't get to Heaven on a choo choo train or any other conveyance. And life on Earth will become increasingly hard as the population increases and exceeds the capacity of resources to support it. The forthcoming chaos and decimation of populations will make the religious conflicts just another factor as people try to find affiliations that will enable them to survive. This is a repetition of what occurs in nature when either the plant or animal population or both, exceeds resources. The only question is when "push will come to shove." And then, the apocalyptic scenario emerges. Ho hum.

Gosh, what is there concerning your activities and intent that would compromise you if revealed. The evil being done to further Islamic ends, needs to be interdicted to save us from harm. To know them is to revile them.

Unfortunately, the beliefs that we characterize as "extreme" are commonly held beliefs of Muslims, and are antithetical to the values of Western civilization. The recent Pew survey in Egypt again ratifies successive polls that provided similar results. The value system of Muslims would replace secular society with one based on the laws of God (Allah) as "revealed" in the Quran. They (some 84% in the recent poll in Egypt) prefer to live under sharia law.

Muslims are impelled by their religion to establish a Caliphate to impose sharia law on the people of the world, subjecting them to the dictates of Islam. They are instructed in tactical moves including taquiyya (lying) to deceive kaffir, us, the people they are seeking to subjugate, and cause to convert to Islam, relegate to second class status, or kill.

The Islamics constitute a clear and present danger. Their current evangelism was fostered by he establishment of madrassas by the Saudis using petrodollars. It is not that there is a new extremism but rather that the Islamics have been inspired and mobilized through indoctrination to achieve their benighted ends and relegate civilization to domination by primitives. Our belief in secularism would be replaced by a theocratic government and adhere to principles enunciated in the Quran including diminished status of women, death to homosexuals, stoning of adulteresses, severing hands and feet for thievery, death to blasphemers or apostates, and many other premises not compatible with the values of civilized folks.

Unfortunately, the beliefs expressed by the Islamic leaders, clerics, are so differentiated from what is considered reasonable and sane by Westerners that we fail to believe their validity. Remember when people said that what Hitler declared was just rhetoric? Well, the Islamics with their suicide bombings, and actions in areas they control have demonstrated their sincerity and intent to act in conformity to their declarations. Wake up.

Since Islam is incompatible with Western thought, we should repatriate Islamics to their countries of origin, remove their capacity to obtain weapons of mass destruction, and seize control of energy resources (oil) until such time as viable substitute sources are found. We should not be reticent to advance our own causes and improve our own situation and standard of living.

How about "gag" ice cream? Drop the last "a." Yuk!

Now why is mother's milk preferred to other milk?

It comes in such cute containers.

Does anyone really now who Obama's father is? The United States in its effort to propitiate the gods has its first acknowledge bastard President (if the story of his conception is true) since his father did not have the capacity to marry being married to another woman at the time. And Obama's black. You figure it out.

Indeed they do. There is nothing like a sexual drive to induce participation in a "movement."

The young are extremely dangerous. They are malleable and do not have experience necessary to evaluate abstract concepts which are not grounded in reality. The gullible youth are in the vanguard of terrible calamities with their manipulation by and support of tyrants. The youth brought Hitler's Nazis, Mussolini's fascists, and the communists to power. They are responsible for Mao's massacres of intellectuals and destabilization of China during the so-called Great Leap Forward. The young were the murderers of a huge proportion of the Cambodian population, killing people for such capitalist and intellectual actions as wearing spectacles, which made them enemies of the people. Young folks loosed without moderation think that they have found "the truth," and unthinkingly accept indoctrination.

Another element is the "freedom from restraint," and sexual license that pervades most of these youth inspired movements. It is a motivating factor for continuing participation. We are still "The Naked Ape" driven by primitive impulses.

Hey, it may be a teenager's wet dream that Chris is having. Is Chris equating his dreams with the American dream.

Let's not get into a psycho sexual analysis. Too bad Krafft-Ebing isn't here to include Chris' thoughts in his seminal work, Psychopathia Sexualis.

There are several misstatements made by the buffoon Sharpton. One is the assertion that the tax dollars from the ghetto neighborhoods are being used to provide vouchers for the rich. What taxes do the ghetto folks pay?

Nevertheless, I oppose vouchers, and think that the demographics should for the most part be kept in neighborhood schools where their intellectual acumen is compatible with that of their fellow students so that teaching can be geared to their limitations. The median IQ of the American black is 85 compared to a nationwide median IQ approximating 100. This distribution, almost a one sigma difference would make vouchers ghetto populations simply a repetition of the failed effort to improve accomplishments of blacks by integrating schools by busing. There is a difference between teaching and learning, and teachers have been vilified because they cannot teach material to students who lack the cognitive ability to learn it.

Opportunities should be provided to capable students in minority neighborhoods by establishing magnet schools to accommodate them and provide them with the opportunity to maximize their accomplishment.

The cries of racist have lost there cachet insofar as many people with whom I interact are concerned. The semantic connotations no longer affect us. It is similar to the cries of the proverbial "boy who cried wolf." It has been overused. The failures of blacks to flourish in areas requiring cognitive abilities transcends "prejudice," and is the consequence of lesser capacity. It is remarkable that those people who espouse evolutionary theory nevertheless put on blinders and claim that there was parallel co-evolution at the same pace in different environments and with a differing introduction of random mutations.

We have a legacy for which the ancestors of many of us are not responsible, but nevertheless are a part of the current scene. Numerous blacks were brought here under terribly onerous inhumane conditions, moved from a milieu to which they were well adapted and placed in one which required skills and characteristics they did not possess for success in the new place. These people were subjected to horrible limitations as slaves and also after manumission. They suffered terribly but have now entered the mainstream. The median IQ of American blacks has increased significantly over the years as they are integrated through genetic intermixture. The median IQ of sub-Saharan blacks is 70 with differences in that region as pygmies have a median IQ of 58. The median IQ of American blacks is 85. There are other differences. We are all homo sapiens. But the range and diversity of abilities is more obvious among dogs, Canis familiaris with such obvious differences in intelligence and disposition and physical abilities as the range between chihuahuas and German Shepherds ,or pit bulls and poodles.

We need to get over our guilt concerning the situation of blacks and realistically devise methods of accommodating them and enabling them to live fulfilled lives by recognizing the differences that exist, and striving to provide a system that does not demean people for their differing abilities. We need to find ways to incorporate them into society without pandering to the demands of the race hustlers.