![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
grimreaper4u
63p36 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 1 reply · +9 points
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 0 replies · +3 points
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 0 replies · +6 points
They did. The showed it to the German computer researcher who discovered that Xerox WorkCentres change numbers on scans of documents. Watch this video and he explains how the software using JBIG2 algorithms can create the artifacts seen on the LFBC PDF :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0O6UXrOZJo
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 0 replies · +8 points
Column 5 clearly says that African is a race.
A black man from Kenya would enter his race as African.
A white man from Kenya would enter his race as European.
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 0 replies · +6 points
Here is the 1962 Kenya Census instructions
http://www.hist.umn.edu/~rmccaa/IPUMSI/CensusForm...
Column 5 clearly says that African is a race.
A black man from Kenya would enter their race as African.
A white man from Kenya would enter his race as European.
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 0 replies · +3 points
Maybe that is what you are thinking is on the D.C. website.
From Hayes' website:
"As stated in my report to Mr. Zullo, the COLB that I examined has so many blatant oddities that it makes me wonder if this particular PDF may have been created in an effort to impeach President Obama. Surely the creator of the document (if it is in fact manufactured and not just a color scan) would have been sufficiently familiar with image editing programs so as to not leave such numerous, noticeable discrepancies in the final product, unless it was intended as an impeachment tool. Familiarity with basic scanning techniques and image editing procedures should have precluded such obvious “mistakes.”"
Notice he says "if it is in fact manufactured and not just a color scan". He has given himself an out for the Xerox machine.
Later he says,
"In short, there are indications that the Obama Certificate of Live Birth released by the White House in April 2011 may be a manufactured document or perhaps even an outright forgery. But without examining the original document housed at the Hawaii Department of Health, there can be no absolute certainty."
Notice he never says it is 100% a forgery.
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 0 replies · +7 points
The Dr. Charles Bennett article was written in 1955 and doesn't mention certificate numbers being added to the BCs.
It does say the following:
"A nurse or clerk in the hospital fills in the certificate form and gets the mother to sign it. Then the attending physician enters certain medical data and affixes his signature. Finally, the hospital sends the completed certificate to the local registrar."
If the physician enters the "certain medical data" by hand (not typed), the certificate might appear to be half written and half typed as described by Dr. Fukino in the MSNBC article of 2011.
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 0 replies · +12 points
Compared to who? Right now you have a statistic of one person. In order to prove a statistical improbability you need more data.
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 0 replies · +9 points
9 years ago @ Birther Report - Feedback: Still Probab... · 0 replies · +4 points
But I notice you can't answer the question. Apparently no one on this site can.
Experiment