brandall
98p1,439 comments posted · 11 followers · following 1
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - BREAKING: Supreme Cour... · 0 replies · +8 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - BREAKING: Supreme Cour... · 0 replies · +15 points
No, it was real. My husband's still sleeping, my cousin and his GF (both rabid supporters) are still sleeping. Last night in the Castro was filled with nothing but happy, cheering, celebrating people. All the bars were jammed with some of the longest lines I've ever seen trying to get in. The restaurants were packed with people waiting outside. Flags everywhere. For the LGBTQ and S communities, it was the "happiest place on earth."
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - BREAKING: Supreme Cour... · 0 replies · +8 points
As can happen this time of year, there was a strong, almost too cold, offshore breeze that probably kept a lot of folks from staying longer. The breeze allowed all of the hand-carried flags to fully extend. It was a sea of rainbow flags, and HRC "=" flags with either blue or red backgrounds.
And, no surprise, a very happy cheering crowd of several hundred supporters.
I hope this helps describe the evening that could not be here for.
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - BREAKING: Supreme Cour... · 2 replies · +6 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - BREAKING: Supreme Cour... · 2 replies · +6 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - BREAKING: Supreme Cour... · 3 replies · +33 points
BREAKING: Supreme Court strikes down bans on same-sex marriage
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Jurors rule that "conv... · 1 reply · +2 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Jurors rule that "conv... · 0 replies · +8 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - No marriage decision t... · 0 replies · +2 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Jurors rule that "conv... · 12 replies · +6 points
Before I sign off for the evening:
1) Obergefell will be released tomorrow...please, please I've planned a party on Saturday around this.
2) 6-3....Roberts won't be on the wrong side of history
3) No mention of the level of scrutiny...too much, too fast and not the right set of frameworks.
4) A sharp rebuke about citing muffins, cakes, cookies, pies, tarts, breads, rolls, pastries....for...uh...what was the name of that 1972 case?......you know, the one with "The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question."