128 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

597 weeks ago @ Loganswarning - Lieberman: Omitting 'I... · 0 replies · +2 points

That was done Nov7 of last year by American Congress for Truth. it is still available, details here:

2010 Edition is due this month, details here:

Please send that information to your Rep. & Sens. by email. You can also alert your state & local officials and others who need to be informed.

597 weeks ago @ Loganswarning - Lieberman: Omitting 'I... · 0 replies · +2 points

597 weeks ago @ Loganswarning - Lieberman: Omitting 'I... · 2 replies · +2 points

604 weeks ago @ Unity Coalition for Is... - HOLMES: Who links terr... · 0 replies · +1 points

The "wrongheaded and hateful political ideology that motivates the terrorists" is Islam! Open your Qur'an to the third Surah and read ayeh # 151. Next, turn to the eighth Surah and read # 12. Those ayat sanctify and mandate casting terror into the hearts of victims of Islamic conquest. Turn to the thirty-third Surah and read #26-27. What did Allah do? What was the result. Turn to the fifty-ninth Surah and read #s 2 & 13. What did Allah do? Why do Kuffar fear Muslims more than they fear Allah?

610 weeks ago @ Loganswarning - CAIR: Love for Jesus u... · 0 replies · +1 points

I just posted my blast at Bloggersbase: Bridge of Deception. Your votes and comments are welcome.

610 weeks ago @ Loganswarning - CAIR: Love for Jesus u... · 2 replies · +2 points

Thank you, Chris for posting this. I was previously unaware of Hooper's horseradish. Such lies must be exposed and you did a good job of laying them open.

610 weeks ago @ Loganswarning - Lying Imam's "Fatwa Ag... · 1 reply · +3 points

The American Muslim ran an editorial on the 9th, trying to make the '05 fatwa look new. They also crowed about the Canuck fatwa. I posted my blast this morning.

To me, what stood out was the assertion that attacking us is wrong because Muslims are free to practice here. The clear implication being that if Islam was restricted here, the attacks would be permissible.

That is in line with the party line, which is that Islamic aggression is defensive in nature, either against direct invasion or to relieve oppression.

the idea of Muslims rejecting violence is risible because Allah sanctified and commanded violent aggression and Moe exemplified it. Islamic law mandates it. If they actually renounced it, their renunciation would entail apostasy, subjecting them to the death penalty.

610 weeks ago @ Unity Coalition for Is... - Hamas and al-Qaeda are... · 0 replies · +1 points

Bill, you have stated a truth which few can bear. Our enemy is one. Its name is Islam. Its scripture is the Qur'an, its tradition is the hadith. Both are quoted in the Charter of Hamas. That charter is available on the web; everyone should read it.

Anyone with an open mind and good comprehension skills will recognize Hamas for what it is: Islam. Al-Qaeda and Hamas are both offshoots of al-Ikhwan. Our elected officials lack the SISU required to recognize and acknowledge that fatal fact. We must do it for them.

610 weeks ago @ Unity Coalition for Is... - McKeon: President Has ... · 1 reply · +1 points

In 1779 the Barbary Pirates began attacking our merchantmen. Tom Jefferson asked Tripoli's Ambassador why they attacked us. The answer he received should penetrate the pc shield. "The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. "
Compare that to the message in Bukhari 1.53.386.

If anyone would read Bukhari 1.8.387, they would realize that we are prey and its open season. Who will inform Congress of the fatal facts?

610 weeks ago @ Loganswarning - Dearborn Student: Shir... · 1 reply · +2 points

What would happen if Christian students wore "Islam is of the devil" t shirts to Edsel Ford High?

What if they printed some choice ayat & ahadith on t shirts and wore them, such as 8:39, 9:29 & 8:67? Would they be punished for that?