bayinferno
64p275 comments posted · 113 followers · following 5
13 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Raising Cain on the Fa... · 0 replies · +3 points
1.. Herman Cain opposed any outside audit of the fed.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiAkeFJXwUk
2. Herman Cain supported the TARP bailouts. http://004eeb5.netsolhost.com/hc133.htm
(note on tarp) (Now Cain has state that TARP was bad because it was misused. He never says the principle of socializing losses for business is bad. He never argues against corporate welfare. only that this application was bad)
3. More on Herman Cain and bailouts. http://004eeb5.netsolhost.com/hc129.htm
My main issue on Herman Cain is here.He is proven time and time again to be a Keynesian. In short he is on the same bandwagon as bush and obama. He thinks government spending can fix the economy. I do not want another Keynesian in the white house. I would like to see someone who believe in the Austrian school of thought get a shot finally.
13 years ago @ Big Government - The Law: What Is Liberty? · 0 replies · +1 points
13 years ago @ Big Government - The Law: What Is Liberty? · 2 replies · 0 points
13 years ago @ Big Government - The Law: What Is Liberty? · 0 replies · +1 points
We will start with drugs. Where in article 1 section 6 of the constitution does it give power to the federal government to prohibit the use of drugs? After reading article 1 section 6 go reread the 10th amendment. Tell me what you come up with. If you don't feel like reading it I will just tell you. The federal government has absolutely NO power to prohibit drug use. Not express power, not implied power. No kind of power. It is a brash over extension of federal power and directly violates the constitution.
13 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Pennsylvania's Rick Sa... · 0 replies · +2 points
13 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - New Mexico's Gary John... · 1 reply · +1 points
The commerce clause was meant to maintain trade between states. If you agree the commerce clause can justify the government to criminalize drugs then you would have to believe the commerce clause could mandate healthcare, allow the EPA, allow the FDA and every other government bureaucracy that has anything to do with goods or services. Why wouldn't they be able to? Why couldn't the commerce clause allow the federal government from stopping boeing from moving their company to south carolina under your logic? I honestly can't even follow your logic. What under the commerce clause could even be translated into allows drug prohibition. Please explain. I at least get your sad attempt at using the general welfare clause. But the commerce I have no idea. You sound like a liberal.
The welfare clause is to give the government the power to tax in order to maintain the welfare of the country. Go read what Jefferson had to say, you can learn a lot. It has NOTHING to do with personal behavior, or personal welfare. The constitution gives specific power to the states not the government to make such laws.
Gary Johnson and Ron Paul are opponents of safety nets. Ron Paul who supports ending the drug war is actually the most outspoken, serious candidate to attack our safety nets. So They should both fit into your acceptable category.
13 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - New Mexico's Gary John... · 3 replies · +1 points
13 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Flash Mob Roughed-Up b... · 0 replies · +2 points
13 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Herman on Hannity: Ame... · 0 replies · +2 points
13 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Herman on Hannity: Ame... · 1 reply · +1 points
Let's talk about Herman Cain though because that's what this argument is about.
In the past he has consistently supported TARP, Bailouts, Stimulus, and secrecy of the fed. That is a fact. And now that he is running for president he is attempting to distance himself from these views. Its a political move. His record is stronger than his rhetoric. He is an actor like the rest of them and this is not an issue that can be let go.
Lets look at the critical error in his logic.
-He has consistently in the past held the belief that an increase in aggregate spending by the government and the manipulation of interest rates by the fed are the best way to fix or maintain our economy. That translates to stimulus, bailouts, and artificially low interest rates that create boom/bust cycles. Is this what the "conservatives" believe in?
-He supported TARP. It was socialization of losses. TARP was socialism. The tax payers ate the losses of a major corporation. And he supported it. He later said he no longer approved of TARP because they picked winners and losers. Not because it socialized losses of huge corporations. So Herman Cain supports tax payer backed corporate welfare. Is this what the "conservatives" believe?
Herman Cain is a man that goes on stage and pretends to be the tea party hero and say's exactly what a Frank Luntz would tell him to say to incite the most cheering. Then he goes home and tries to calculate how the government can solve everyone's problems instead of how to turn people's fates back over to the people.