NOT desperate. PPACA/Obama-Hillarycare is on the books. A law on the books has a virtual immortality.

Why do you think the Obama faction under the whip of N. Pelosi was so desperate to enact as law as fast as they did. Using the gangsterish methods known to us all?

Is it probable that participants in their success would actually be "desperate" because a few people criticise it.

Criticise details. But NOT cutting to the chase '
RESOLVING on REPEAL of those 2000 plus pages. Passed into law "to know what was in those pages". Do ANY of the Legislature and Judiciary KNOW even now what IS in those 2000 plus pages? If not whatever criticism other than complete repeal is grandstanding.

WHAT IS in those pages to be sprung on citizens when expedient for the powers that be in their beloved Big Government?

Elementary, primary, grade school playground responses to the latest in the BH Obama Saga

Lest we forget he's the "class president" and idol of the brotherhoods of the best and brightest.. The Big Man on Campus and thus righteous in whatever he says, thinks or does.

Who outside his privileged and protected enclave has evidence to assume his actions as incompetent. Or anything other than designed to whatever goals he and his troupes/ troops are decided upon. Where is the evidence for our assessment?

What we see is not necessarily what we get. As we should now know about the Obama Bandwagon.

Obama is, and has been since becoming their candidate as nominee for POTUS, surrounded supported and enabled by the MOST intelligent, learned, aware, compassionate, decent , truthful, law-abiding - not only in the letter but the spirit of the Law - and honourable people to ever grace the offices of government of the USA. Not least the Clinton twins and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

How many of us of the commonfold can possibly understand persons of such exalted provenance, such exalted personal history as Obama, this child of mystery mentored by Columbia and Harvard LAW School eminences

Some of them probably know the method in what appears his incompetence. They after all did not require a full and provable curriculum vitae before electing him drum major of their little bands. Nor do they require such since his elevation to the most powerful man in the world.

Were content as were so many trained in their educational enterprises to accept him as given. Does he not after all possess the glamour, pretty face, nice line in patter and good speech so necessary in leadership to charm great numbers of people in this their New Age??.

We outside their charmed circle are merely audience to their play. And for all that un-notewirthy except for the bottom line.

And how these brotherhoods of the best and brightest depend upon our blood and treasury to maintain their place on center stage. And are determined to hold that place whatever the cost to US.

Someone in the Media needs to pin down Obama as to ...?. Now who would that be? Which Media? Which pundits or "interviewers"?

Do not forget that B.Hussein Obama would not, could not, have been elected as President were it not for members of the DNC who "certified" him as "eligible" as nominee for POTUS.

Despite reservations at the time of his "legal" eligibilty. That qualifier" legal" yet to be examined aurhoritatively and adequately by "appropriate" agencies.

Certification by Chair of the DNC Nancy Pelosi, a lawyer. With second from Hillary Clinton also a lawyer both assumed au fait with the law in detail. Especially that Fundamental Law, the Constitution that each of them swears/affirms oath on taking office in government to Uphold and Defend.

Subsequent activities of BH Obama himself with those of Pelosi and Clinton informs much about what they are and intend In their "Fundamental Transformation of the Nation". With such intentions there is and can be no "scandal" as long as the goal is advanced.

Using "whatever works" and ", anything goes" in their assaults on the USA as a "Country of Law" . To trash that Law "Because they CAN" is effective if not especially original. THEY are the big boys on the block.

A failure to adequately, thoroughly VET applicants for employment as usual, habitual , even for street sweeper. is odd in itself. But for the job of President of the USA is dereliction that suggests ulterior intention.

And there appears nobody in the responsible offices of government, Legislature and or Judiciary has the slightest interest examining this failure. So with the refusal of members of Legislature and Judiciary to do their jobs this NON VETTING continues apace.

That "Something is rotten in the State" becomes daily increasingly clear.. That the rot is eating away the foundations of the nation also clear.

To "deconstruct" the foundations on which any structure, including that of nation, stands is "Fundamental" in any intended transformation. The "transformer / transformers " move amongst those within the gates freely... ... work secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the City. (with thanks to Marcus Tullius Cicero)

In this New America "trust no one" is the only safe method of being

The from bottom to top in information/propaganda media to Elected by citizens to the most honoured offices in the land as models for ways of being.

With their premise that "words - and now with universal visual media, pictures - mean just what I (they) choose them to mean, neither more nor less" there can be no "scandal" about them or their behaviours

" Phoney" created by people with a world view applicable insofar as possible in fallible humans to trust, honour, truthfulness and facts as well as compassion and liberality in the archaic senses, P.B.O.

Pre-Barack Obama, a man of mysterious provenance - born in a manger? -, with his disciples and apostles Nancy Pelosi/Harry Reid and Hillary Clinton with conjoined twin WJ to "build his(their) church on the rock of PPACA".

Those who see "scandals" fail to understand that NOTHING is scandalous in pursuit of "Fundamental Transformation of the Nation", CHANGE "for the common good, i.e. the good of the people".

By hook or by crook, What after all do the "common people" the "astro-turf", members of "that vast right-wing conspiracy" know of what is good for them when they have the best and brightest elite to decide for them.

WHAT does scandal mean in that context? Come now boys and girls, essay?

Saddam was defeated in a matter of weeks. You are of course referring to that war with George Bush Senior that was indeed won by America in a matter of weeks. Perhaps that was before your time.

BUT on recommendation from Colin Powell, Secretary of State Bush Sr. ordered that victorious army to stand down. If i got it right, Colin Powell at behest of the UN recommended the commanding general who saw his way clear to Baghdad and the final ousting of Saddam to stop and desist.

The upshot of that pull-back was a relentless hunting down for the following decade
by Saddam and his goons of any who gave aid and comfort to the US. And if we believe reports from other media than our "ethical/principled" we can imagine what that hunt and penalty entailed for persons caught.

Had that first war in Iraq been permitted its inevitable conclusion the second Bush Iraq War would probably not have been necessary with all its costs in money, blood and effects on the USA. We might surmise that 9/11 would still be fantasy in some hothead's dreams.

Nice try. Benghazi.

"The press has ... treated this story with ambivalence and reluctance..." The same reluctance displayed for the McCarthy Hearings, HUAC and those chapters in recent American history Watergate, Monicagate, Climategate...?

For those of us who think fairy tales archetypal, the wicked witch at the celebration of the birth of the New Age - fundamental transformation of the body politic of the USA to the designs of "liberals / democrats" - is the constitutionally protected "free press" that curses the infant (America a very young Republic as Republics go) to sleep until awakened to fundamental transformation with the kiss of the prince.

Some/many? of the members of that exclusive club and the gods they worship understand that Constitutional First Amendment protection of speech, thought, opinion is reserved ONLY for that "free press. Otherwise archaic, irrelevant and defective q.v. political correctness..

So we finally accept, with reluctance and foreboding the wisdom developing through our "education"/training/brainwashing that with the "free press" of the USA as we must apply lessons learned of our politicians and educators that nulllius in verba.

Remember what finally ended the Depression of the 1930s after the willful prolongation by the politicies of FDR and his advisors? ____Should we watch carefully for Obama to repeat that saving ploy? We already know not only from his statements, i.e. "ashamed of this country" and his destructive actions with active and passive cooperation from representatives of the People in Congress and Judiciary. that Obama hates/despises the nation and her people and wishes them ill.. ____Watch this space for the FDR ( JF Kennedy ) hat trick by Obama to get ALL the people behind him as distraction from the economic mess he has deliberaely escalated.. China is sabre rattling and plays by different rules than the goo-goo West..____Presidents can always, with a little help from their friends in Congress, find a plausible reason to send young men, and now maybe young women of America to fight and die in foreign fields. That is one way to "bring the country together" IF the propaganda/entertainment/educational media are fans of that particular warmonger.

We can only guess what precentage of Congressmen, Judges et al and punditry are giving Obama a pass about his first assault on the truth. Obama's SEALING under Executive Order ALL documents of his provenance.

How appropriate is Obama's story of his provenance based on his "word"? Word already proven to be flexible to fact and meaning.

In failing to insist, demand Obama produce unassailable evidence he is lawfully president of the USA. the door is opened to fundamental CHANGE to the law of the USA. Possibly inherently unlawful changes.

The question of Obama's provenance from birth deserves an answer supported on common and legal meanings of truth. Each time the questions of his provenance are raised, Obama's attack dogs and brown shirts in punditry and media are set loose to threaten the questioners and any who might consider their quesitons and demands legitimate.

Is tthis America. Doesn't it matter the identity beyond a shadow of doubt who the President is? In ALL relevant particulars? WHO is Obama, from where does he come?

Small and Innocent? lies when applying for the job/office in the world with powers to CHANGE the entire world. With no apparent concern, as are most of us at the possibility our "letters of reference" might, just might, be investigated before the job is offered? An unusual casualness.

Then when the job attained ALL documents SEALED under Executive Order to assure their secrecy "in perpetuity".

Why so little linterest ,from the influence media print and TV and "imvestigative journalists"? As for example past and present history for Sarah Palin., Before her at this 40th anniversary of Watergate Richard Nixon.

Could such uninterest in the media/punditry be construed by reasonable people as "Cover-up"? If so, of what ? For what reason/reasons?