No it shan't.
take that back.

"Guys? What if we introduce a human cast member!"
"Just hear me out, guys!"

Oh so now they take her to a real doctor? When the condition has gotten progressively worse. NOW they want to use modern medicine. I don't mean to be hurtful, I have a friend who is suffering from cancer and it pisses me off how much money is being wasted on alternative medicine instead of actual cancer research.

An according to you, they're still wasting money on alternative medicine. That's what upsets me. All these funds could've really helped cancer research, instead its being wasted.

Why do people pay money for these parents alternative "medicine" scheme? All this money could've helped kids around the world with cancer, instead of plugging it away on some hippy crap.

I just wish the parents would take her to a real doctor! Alternative medicine doesn't work.

God. how much times do I have to see this joke before people get how unfunny it is.

You're just upset that you have no real defense for this abomination and you rather cling to hasbro's sweaty balls because you love ponies that much.

I enjoy people having different opinions, it serves to validate mine.

Sorry, what point are you trying to make here?

You admit that it's a logical conclusion (that has evidence backing it up) but your counter argument is.. "it's not a 100% verifiable fact". I thought I just told you how senseless it is to argue that way.

You realize nothing can be verified to 100%? Even your own bloody name. I think people who argue this way are pretentious. A good argument challenges the 'likeliness' of something not the "ability for it to be 100% fact'. The former, deals with actual points and counter argument, the latter tries to blueball the argument into some quantum physics bullshit.

the FACT is, Cadance is the only Alicorn that can cast powerful love magic that wills ponies into falling inlove with eachother. (This is a fact). Nothing, and I mean ABSOLUTELY nothing suggests otherwise. I refuse to entertain this "what if" until sliver of counter evidence is show. until then, and only then. You and her do not have a point and it's babyish to pretend otherwise.

"oh but what if this happens". Well, if it does happen, then we can entertain the new possibilities. Until then, WHY are we pretending that the information we have isn't conclusive? Why are we pretending like all the evidence isn't leaning on one side.

But please, explain how my arguing method could lead me to conclude that there are flying kangeroo's in MLP. What with my side requiring evidence and making logical connection. And your side just relying on 'the possibility'. Well then, who 100% verified that there aren't flying kangeroo's in MLP!!!

Well then, seems to me, like you have a silly way of arguing.

Neigh child.

Perhaps I can use your analogy. We are in the position, where we have video knowledge of that thief co-worker walking in and kind of hasstling with your wallet. We didn't directly see him (or her) take the money, but we have quite alot of evidence to suggest that they did.
That alone would convict any criminal.

Now, what you're proposing is we throw away all that suggestive evidence because it's not definitive enough? Or 100% absolute?

That sounds like absolute madness to me. If we see evidence to the contrary, like video image of him putting back the money and leaving, then of course! We should be doubtful then. But if we are at the place where Cadence has a bloody heart on her ass (indictive of special talent) and she's the only one casting love spells, then what the hell other conclusion can we make?

Be honest now. It is actually illogical to say "well that can mean many things" or it's not 100-honest-to-god-confirmed" Don't complicate things until you have evidence of them. Absolute knowledge is impossible and unnecessary for our day to day lives. No one actually operates on such infallible terms. We go for the 'most likely'. until proven otherwise.

I mean by this same argument you could dismiss absolutely anything about the show or support anything, from flying kangeroos to a Pinkie Pie riding on giant green lizards. To me, thats a sign of a very weak argument.

Also that harpy replying to me isn't concerned about 'all the data'. She just wants to score cheap points.

"I said that I was using your tactics against you. By admitting that I was doing that, you admit that they were your tactics, and hence your doing. "
well, aint that some loopy ass logic.

Actually, I do have proof, have you seen anyother Unicorn cast the same spell? Nope, then my stance remains firm.

It was HIS spell, that Cadance duplicated, not the other way around. nice try though. well it wasn't, but I'm sure you thought it was clever.

That's not true though, we know she's getting new princess responsibilities. Concede this, so we can move on.

I'm not trying my best to avoid an answer, I want to wrap up Argument A before I move on to Argument B. I'm waiting for you to address the counter point I made earlier before I move on.