Verdaderamente
35p47 comments posted · 4 followers · following 0
6 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Nick Hargrave: Yes, I ... · 0 replies · +1 points
https://youtu.be/VenomHl4D5k
6 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Martin Howe: Misunders... · 0 replies · +1 points
It would be helpful to have an example of a ‘major partner’. Would such a major partner also be a major partner in a trade deal with the EU? If so, can we have an example of what kind of item would be advantageous to this major partner to sell in the UK with a different standard to that applied when selling in the EU? If the major partner with whom we wish to do a trade deal does not have/plan to have a trade deal with the EU, what sort of product does it wish to sell us that would only be worthwhile if it knows it does not need to apply EU standards? Some concrete examples, even if speculative, would be useful.
6 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - There will be no Brexi... · 1 reply · +1 points
7 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Iain Duncan Smith: The... · 2 replies · +1 points
The difference with the bill in question is that the UK government ministers would be able to act as Executive and Legislature, with little if any opportunity for scrutiny by parliament. This is 'normal' but only in limited well defined circumstances, whereas the bill seriously loosens these criteria.
EU law has been subjected to the principles of the separation of powers, and then adopted into UK law according to the terms of our membership. Obviously the UK no longer wants this arrangement. The objection to yesterday's bill seems to me a different question.
7 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Peter Lilley: Don't lo... · 3 replies · +1 points
7 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Tory MPs, the Repeal B... · 2 replies · +1 points
7 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Daniel Hannan: A year ... · 4 replies · +1 points
The referendum question was Leave or Remain in the EU. What any voter was thinking in terms of motives at the time he cast his vote, is constitutionally irrelevant. To enact the wish of the people it is only necessary to Leave. Claiming that Leave voters wanted 'sovereignty', reduced immigration, etc, may or may not be true, but is irrelevant! So, since Norway and Switzerland are not members of the EU, an agreement like theirs will fulfill the 'will of the people'. Rather than everyone arguing about who promised what to whom and what voters were thinking, we should all be looking to debate the issues in terms of the possible 'Brexits' available right now.
7 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - James Frayne: Back to ... · 1 reply · +1 points
Boris Johnson and Michael Gove washed the Party's linen in public. They are no better than they ought to be. Respectability is an old fashioned virtue beloved of conservatives.
Why did Michael Gove's condemnation of Boris Johnson stop his leadership bid? Is there some rule requiring Gove's approval above all others? Gove's treachery was a get out of gaol free card for Boris Johnson. The leadership at that point, for anyone but a Brexit fanatic, was always a hospital pass. Prime Minister is on Boris Johnson's bucket list, no doubt, but not self-sacrifice for the greater good. Theresa May, for all her potentially disastrous faults, is guided by the purest motives
7 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Ashley Fox: The electi... · 2 replies · +1 points
7 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Sarah Ingham: After th... · 0 replies · +1 points
You do have to watch till the end.
https://youtu.be/ptfmAY6M6aA