this review sounds way too heated and adjective filled to be even remotely objective. I think someone needs to lighten up...
I gotta disagree here. Obama has stuck very hardcore to his beliefs and has proven absolutely determined to shove them down our throats regardless of the amount of widespread public disapproval for the acts he has undertaken that stem from his beliefs. One cannot say that he is a panderer or inconsistent. I despise his beliefs but no one can honestly say that he hasn't stuck to them at all costs.
Think logically, every anti-Obama article isn't necessarily a good one and if a person merely performs a seal clap at every statement that loosely but irrationally supports your sentiments then well you end up looking like a democrat/progressive.
I'm sorry but this article did not make a whole lot of sense. Why is abortion repeated over and over again and what the hell does abortion have to do with a lincoln/obama comparison. I'm pretty sure abortion was not really a part of Lincoln's thought process during his time. I agree that Obama is an uber-pretentious turd for actively comparing himself to Lincoln, but this article makes no sense at all in trying to delineate why Obama is not a Lincoln.
shuffling around tax derived handouts is a lot like rearranging deck chairs on the titanic. The real issue Californians need to focus on is understanding how their government has created an environment in which legitimate and historically successful businesses cannot afford to conduct business inside their state. If the entertainment industry can't afford to conduct business in California without being subsidized by government then it needs to move anyway. The point is the entertainment biz can't turn a profit without a handout so where is the real economic boon (i.e. tax revenues) going to come from? Your really just robbing Peter to pay Paul. Also, like any business, the entertainment industry will go wherever it conduct produce a profit so it could very easily return to California if the business environment changed. Business is business and historical tradition of doing biz in particular area is not a suicide pact.
"If California didn’t have enough economic problems, you can add shooting yourself in the foot.", and thats only if its a firearm on the California DOJ approved list mind you!
I think these antics speak volumes in that the leftist ideal is fundamentally anti-human as is clearly seen in this case. When animals and inanimate objects are given the same moral status as human beings then watch out. I guarantee you humanity will not come out on top.
I hate to rain on Hillary's parade but her distraction theory concerning Iran does not hold a lot of water. It sounds very clever but think about it why would Iran give two sh!ts about the U.S. and the west being distracted by Egypt's troubles when nobody was actively doing a g-damn thing about their nuclear program to begin with!? The reason this ludicrous theory is being advanced is simply to provide a way for this administration to blame exigent circumstances for their own complete lack of action in preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons.
I can't believe that people actually let Obama off the hook here by thinking he is just inept. What about the evidence that his administration actively funded and participated in the protest movements in Egypt? Couple that with the much more forceful rhetoric from his administration basically urging the Egyptian president to step-down. Mass revolts don't just materialize out of nowhere. This president has worked towards this very conclusion. We all know, as well, that no one ever believed that a popular uprising would conclude with anything but the establishment of an islamist state. So what the hell is Obama's end game here?
Don't let this man off the hook by mistaking him for a buffoon. I wish he was just a Carter like buffoon but he is not. I truly and honestly doubt his allegiances when it comes to secular western government and islamic theocracy. I think he is trying to, as subtly as possible, create the conditions necessary for islamists to have the necessary edge to succeed in their attempts to dominate the middle east and destroy Israel.
I hate to rain on Hillary's parade but her distraction theory concerning Iran does not hold a lot of water. It sounds very clever but think about it why would Iran give two sh!ts about the U.S. and the west being distracted by Egypt's troubles when nobody was actively doing a g-damn thing about their nuclear program to begin with!? The reason this ludicrous theory is being advanced is simply to provide a way for this administration to blame exigent circumstances for their own complete lack of action in preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons.
I fully support your efforts in attempting to dismantle this protection racket. However, could you please clarify which provision of the U.S. constitution guarantees you have the right to earn an honest living free from unreasonable regulations? Don't get me wrong, I believe something like that should be included in our constitution but it isn't there now... If this is your method of attack it is doomed to failure.
Man thanks for turning me on to Tobacco!! great stuff!
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Opus