It sounds like it was 348 people who were arrested, but not all of them in Canada? But 386 children were rescued? Does this mean that these children were not simply photographed, but had been kidnapped?
You had ME at ambignostic!
Oh no ... you've cut the BEE GEES? Dang it, I'd jump up and down with scorn ... but you trump it by disliking Sarah, and that kind of erases my rancor.
I seldom side with executing people .. but frankly, if someone is abusing your child, it seems obvious that rage is justified. If you can't stop that rage from killing the person, eh. It's just instant judgment. So be it.
Yes, but she didn't want a child, did she? She wanted to kill someone. If she'd wanted a child that she could raise, nurture and love .. she'd have planned at least enough to grab a child that people wouldn't instantly doubt belonged to her, given her color and the child's.
I have to admit that it is fairly crazy. If her idea was to kidnap a child (any child), it's fairly crazy to not target someone whose baby MIGHT be assumed to be HERS. So that kind of appears to point to the fact that she didn't particularly want to get away. She just wanted to kill someone and take their child. Frightening to wonder what next step would have been taken, if she hadn't been found! Thank goodness they found the infant so quickly!
Right. And then the cop was totally sure he'd get off lightly, so he ripped the back window out of his own vehicle, and attacked the guy so the guy would "appear" to be psycho or a bully or something.
Your questions are seriously ridiculous. My husband could totally do it. He wouldn't (he wouldn't even threaten to). But there is no question in my mind about whether or not he "could". I'm not certain it would even be a great amount of difficulty, given my size, his size and the size of our car.
FIrst of all, unless the trooper perceived the guys AS a threat to him, he would be unlikely to be cuffed. Secondly, who cares whether the wife was cheating or not? Reacting in a physically dangerous manner is not acceptable. Plus, the TROOPER wasn't cheating on the guy, and he got attacked. Why do you care whether the tazer was even used, let alone whether it had "an effect on this person"? The only person I care about is the officer, who was attacked while performing his job.
And LASTLY ... the ROOT CAUSE of his "Mental anger" is that he chose to be angry. Other people do not "make" you angry. You CHOOSE it. You OWN it.
Okay ... now WHY is this captioned "STRAY CAT" ...?? It was the family cat, which just happened to be an outdoor cat. In Central Oregon, this is a normal situation, with cats allowed to roam and catch field mice. Ours even caught a few birds and rabbits. There are often several acres between houses.
And YET ... while the caption called it a stray cat, the FAMILY states that it is THEIR outdoor cat. Outdoor cats in central Oregon are a normal thing. We had 8 of them, and I never saw one of ours go close to the road. Instead, they roamed our hillside. We actually had less problem with fleas for all eight of them together, than we've had with our one strictly indoor cat, since we moved to Beaverton.
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Opus