NoPC_here

NoPC_here

76p

480 comments posted · 4 followers · following 0

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 0 replies · +2 points

Champ, Is it my imagination that most of the notorious evil people of the world look like what I have been accustomed to seeing as visual manisfestations of the devil. It is as though someone else has been there and done that long ago. (A perfect example was Lenin and now Ahmad.)

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 7 replies · +3 points

If Ahmad is god, I'd sure hate to see the devil. Surely, Iran has god and devil mixed up.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: But is \'... · 0 replies · +3 points

"But is 'Islam' at war with us?" (Article)

The theology of a religion is defined by it's True Believers. The True Believers of Islam conform to Sharia and this puts them at "war" with all non-Muslims. The only real question is how much energy they may be putting into the "war".

I believe that they will wage as much war with us as their perceived victories will allow them in a practical sense. They will go as far as they can go with us. They will fight and intimidate us as far as we will allow and they will not stop until we stop them. They have and will always be the agressors until they perceive a total Muslim world. Then, if that ever happens, it is most likely that they will continue to fight with each other in an effort toward the True Believers' perceived model of "perfect" Islam which will assure an infinite continuation in fighting until the last Muslim is standing. Just review Islamic behaviour for the last 1400 years. The conclusion is obvious.

For them, it is a fight to the death. Our leaders are fools to believe otherwise.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: "Nobody d... · 0 replies · +2 points

Agreed!

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Indonesia... · 0 replies · +3 points

"But is 'Islam' at war with us?" (Article)

The theology of a religion is defined by it's True Believers. The True Believers of Islam conform to Sharia and this puts them at "war" with all non-Muslims. The only real question is how much energy they may be putting into the "war".

I believe that they will wage as much war with us as their perceived victories will allow them in a practical sense. They will go as far as they can go with us. They will fight and intimidate us as far as we will allow and they will not stop until we stop them. They have and will always be the agressors until they perceive a total Muslim world. Then, if that ever happens, it is most likely that they will continue to fight with each other in an effort toward the True Believers' perceived model of "perfect" Islam which will assure an infinite continuation in fighting until the last Muslim is standing. Just review Islamic behaviour for the last 1400 years. The conclusion is obvious.

For them, it is a fight to the death. Our leaders are fools to believe otherwise.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Teenage g... · 0 replies · +1 points

Our federal government allows immigration from third world countries, willie-nillie, and we expect the immigrants NOT to bring their old country ways with them? And our federal government wants to know why we don't trust them with our health care.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Apologist... · 0 replies · +2 points

You are correct. I would also add that todays Christians forget passages in the Bible such as, "It is better to tie a millstone around his neck and throw him into the lake...". That sounds like self defense and capital punishment to me, but it is convienently forgotten in todays world. That was not the case 50 years ago.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Peace-lov... · 0 replies · +1 points

It is a case where Muslim leaders can wave some money in front of the "best politicians that money can buy", and our politicians jump for the money. (Some politicians excluded, of course.)

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Apologist... · 2 replies · +6 points

This is a work of art. Pat Condell said is so well that only an idiot could disagree.

Ahem, now for all the idiots.....If an Islamic (or any other) gang makes an unprovoked hit on you or your fellow countrymen, it is not racism or Islamophobia to defend yourself, your sister or brother, your family, your friends, your neighbor, or even your country from more attacks. It doesn't matter even if this Islamic gang is all one race, Its OK, go ahead and defend. You are not a racist or Islamophobe. Now if you do otherwise, (ahem) you are confrming to everyone that you are an idiot.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - www.jihadwatch.org/arc... · 0 replies · +4 points

This is a work of art. Pat Condell said is so well that only an idiot could disagree.

____Ahem, now for all the idiots.....If an Islamic (or any other) gang makes an unprovoked hit on you or your fellow countrymen, it is not racism or Islamophobia to defend yourself, your sister or brother, your family, your friends, your neighbor, or your country from more attacks. It doesn't matter even if this Islamic gang is all one race, Its OK, go ahead and defend. You are not a racist or Islamophobe. Now if you do otherwise, (ahem) you are confrming to everyone that you are an idiot.