IntenseDebate - NatDem

11 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 0 replies · +12 points

Iceland is a great influence as it is not an EU member state and makes vasts amount of wealth out of its own resources. Iceland is a proper good example for renewable energy, it uses hydro energy, geothermal energy and hydrogen fuel for electricity, heating and fuel unlike the United Kingdom that goes along with useless wind farms and solar panels.

Iceland has based its currency on a labour standard, not a paper standard nor a gold standard.

11 years ago @ http://www.belfasttele... - \'BBC documentary on t... · 1 reply · -6 points

They are not Christian fundamentalists, they do not praise Jesus Christ, the Pope or any of the Catholic radicals of the past, they praise Che Guevara, Nelson Mandela and the International Brigadiers in the Spanish Civil War. They are close to supporting Marxists instead of Christians.

11 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 6 replies · +10 points

Jobbik's MEP Krisztina Morvai was married to György Baló who was a Jewish media man.

11 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 0 replies · +2 points

Nothing wrong with what Churchill said, he spoke out against mass immigration far more strong than Enoch Powell did.

Besides, Enoch Powell supported Neoliberalism and was a supporter of Thatcherism.

11 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 7 replies · +7 points

David Cameron is British, he is a descendent of King William IV and is a distant cousin of Adam Hart Davies.

Stop playing this purist nonsense that you have to be 100% pure British to be British. You are playing into the hands of the multiracialists who will say that we are all a land of immigrants just because a white person may have 5% non-white blood in him.

11 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 2 replies · +2 points

Thanks but that does not explain how Marxist theories like class consciousness are flawed nor does it explain a better alternative system to Marxism.

Kropotkin was no different to Marx at all, his theory was based on this view that all human beings are pure and innocent and that they should not be competitive. Kropotkin described his theory as "Anarcho-Communism" by which many Anarcho-Reds are influenced. The Anarcho-Reds who beat up Nationalists and form ANTIFA.

Anarcho-Communism denies people the right to own and be rewarded for the effort they put in.

11 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 1 reply · +1 points

Privatisation does not always mean the erosion of workers rights, far from it, when it was implemented in Germany utilities had to remain German owned and could not be outsourced and also the German Labour Front, a state backed industrial trade union, ended all company abuse in every company since every worker and every businessman had to join the union and treat each other like brothers.

11 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 0 replies · +3 points

Is it in order that the Communists can rob people of their wealth and give it all to their wealth banker friends and then start borrowing money from them?

Because Commies want a 100% income tax on rich people and income tax, as we know, is to pay back debts to the bankers from whom our political elites borrow money.

11 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 4 replies · +2 points

Right this sounds good but the writer of this article needs to explain why Marxism is wrong and why Marxism is not the alternative because Marxists will say that we are supposed to be having class solidarity with immigrant workers (or should I say MIGRANT SCABS!) in unity against the capitalist class.

Also, the writer needs to explain about what needs to be done to the capitalists who import migrants for low wages. What should be done to stop wages from dropping? What should workers be really earning?

Since this article is claiming to be anti-capitalist and "socialist", what sort of socialism would you be advocating? There are many types of socialism of course. And how should profit be made? What should be done with profit?

PLUS foreign capital? If we expropriate it, the owners of it will take it somewhere else and then the country would be bankrupt with the Stock Exchange going bust.

11 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 5 replies · +8 points

National Socialist Germany under Hitler did not nationalise anything but started privatising things as well and Hitler made friends with capitalists as well.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with NatDem

People I'm following

NatDem