MikeTheInfidel
52p93 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0
10 years ago @ [old] Thoughts from a ... - Why Science Will Alway... · 0 replies · 0 points
10 years ago @ [old] Thoughts from a ... - Why Science Will Alway... · 0 replies · 0 points
1. That's absolutely nowhere to be found in the Bible.
2. That's absolutely identical to God not existing.
11 years ago @ The New Civil Rights M... - Fox News Mistakes Lesb... · 0 replies · +7 points
11 years ago @ Thoughts from a Godles... - Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand we&rs... · 0 replies · +1 points
12 years ago @ Thoughts from a Godles... - A glimpse into my brai... · 0 replies · +1 points
information about how many images there are, what kind of disc they are, and how many sectors each one uses metadata about the game (several consecutive 512-byte blocks the raw ISO images themselves, consecutive and aligned at 0x100000 (image number * size of BD50 disk)
Believe me, I tried the easy way :) No luck.
12 years ago @ Thoughts from a Godles... - Wrapping up the Alpha ... · 0 replies · +1 points
"Predicting" events that have already happened is pointless. Imagine the number of atoms in any given grain of sand. Now, imagine the number of possible ways those atoms could be arranged. What are the chances that they'd just happen to be in the arrangement they're in, without an intelligent design? Practically zero. And yet... trillions of grains of sand, no intelligent sand-maker.
Think of the number of sperm any male of reproductive age will produce in his lifetime. Now think of how many eggs the average woman has in her body. Multiply those together. Then multiply those by the number of generations we've seen just going back to the first anatomically modern humans some 200,000 years ago. What are the chances that all those sperm-egg pairs would match up and result in you? Practically zero. And yet... here you are.
Moreover, anyone who claims to know the chances of a self-reproducing cell forming is lying, considering that no human being knows what those chances are.For the big things, fine tuning in the universe is pretty darn impressive. So much so that the most recent atheistic origin of life researchers I've read are talking about there must be something on the order of 10 to the tens of thousand power of parallel universes. A tiny problem is that the evidence for parallel universes is a little hard to find.
Fine tuned for what, exactly? The universe is better designed for producing black holes than it is for producing life. Something on the order of 99.999999999999999999...% of the universe would kill any living thing instantly.
Bottom line, the numbers don't add up for the universe and life to be here without an intelligent designer.
Nope. Bottom line, the evidence points to an undesigned universe where life arose by chance.
12 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Psychic classes for ki... · 0 replies · 0 points
1. The universe is finite.
2. There is only one reality, and different approaches to it are not all equally valid. There are right and wrong answers. Psychic nonsense is one of the wrong ones.
12 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Psychic classes for ki... · 0 replies · +1 points
And now we've LEARNED THINGS. This is why our understanding changes.
12 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Psychic classes for ki... · 0 replies · +2 points
Your beliefs about scientific concepts are utterly irrelevant. All perspectives are not equally valuable.
12 years ago @ http://www.belfasttele... - Richard Dawkins: Creat... · 0 replies · +3 points