IntenseDebate - Lemmiwinks

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Seven cha... · 1 reply · -2 points

What is there I should acknowledge, they served for thier own selfish gain as summed up by obtaining U.S nationality. Should I prostrate myself at the very thought of the risk they put themselves in, for thier gains, and for the fallout which has been created for future generations?

My computer says no.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Seven cha... · 5 replies · -15 points

Its much the same as how America grants national status to non-American nationals who are willing to go to war, for and under America's banner.

I wonder how many people were sworn in over the course of 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'...

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: UK: Non-M... · 1 reply · -5 points

I guess you have some history revision to do baseballmaven.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Liberal g... · 0 replies · +1 points

Homosexuals, the new damsel in distress?

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: More Hono... · 0 replies · -6 points

Dead people, stay dead and there is nothing 'moral' about that. Why do you feel as if im playing games in the arguement I have made here.

You say Islam covers for a males who go batshit crazy and kill thier children and wives, I point out the Anglophone has used mental health institutions to do the very same. Granting murderers the ability to appeal to thier judge on the grounds of diminished responsibility for a lesser sentance.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: More Hono... · 2 replies · -5 points

You go first, tell me as a women and a child if your rights are respected.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: More Hono... · 2 replies · -6 points

You are still hiding behind the imaginary women and children Sorrow01.

When you decide to explain why males murdered because of 'love triangle' relationships are not in your eyes equally victimised as the imaginary women and children you feign so much concern over I might be able exchange ideas with you. It wont happen though because the feminine & vulnerable scarecrows you errect are all you need to keep yourself safe and sound in the reasonless and ignorant pit of Islamophobia youve dug for yourself.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: More Hono... · 4 replies · -5 points

And what issue would that be?

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: UK: Non-M... · 0 replies · -3 points

Women should wear helmets insted of headscarves ~ if they are on front line police duty.
If they arent on the front line, why do they need the garments supplied by the tax payer. Hankerchiefs and underware arent part of the standard issue Policing kit.

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: UK: Non-M... · 3 replies · -13 points

Or having teachers wear khaki outfits while teaching at a racialy segregated inner city school.

I wonder if you two children are begining to learn.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with Lemmiwinks

People I'm following

Lemmiwinks