IntenseDebate

6 years ago @ Yiddish Daily Forward - ייִדישע „... · 0 replies · +1 points

קײן מאָל ניט אָנהײבט מען אַ ייִדיש װאָרט מיט דער שלאָס-מם.

9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Don\'t Be Shocked Jewi... · 0 replies · -2 points

What claim? I don't see it anywhere, and it certainly wouldn't have been deleted because I don't use n aughty l anguage.

9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Don\'t Be Shocked Jewi... · 2 replies · 0 points

"No!!! I didn't say Michaelson said that."

I never said you did. Michaelson...Niemöller...two completely different names. I think your ease at totally mixing things up proves my point. And what's this "I meant Jews go around saying..." business?! It reads more than a little anti-Semitic.

9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Kim Kardashian Photosh... · 0 replies · 0 points

1. The FORWARD's readers' comments statement does not cover the content of Haaretz.

2. Adding "Haaretz" to the search for "Ronit Peskin" AND "Allison Kaplan Sommer" doesn't exclude much. Do you have something more specific, like with a title and/or date? Or even what the particular attack was?

9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Kim Kardashian Photosh... · 2 replies · +1 points

I checked the seven occurences in the FORWARD where "Ronit Peskin" and "Allison Kaplan Sommer" are found on the same page and found nothing approaching an ad hominem attack. Could you be more specific before I go searching the entire internet?

9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Kim Kardashian Photosh... · 4 replies · 0 points

Doesn't the "The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments..." statement above rule out ad hominem attacks? Or are ad feminam attacks permitted?

9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Kim Kardashian Photosh... · 0 replies · -1 points

If the point of the article in "Kikar HaShabbat" was that Mayor Nir Barkat dines in a “non-kosher restaurant that violates the Sabbath,” one wonders why even publish the photo of him and Kanye West.

9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Kim Kardashian Photosh... · 0 replies · 0 points

Gratuitous?! It seems to have gotten a reaction from you. Somewhere, the digital layout editor for "The Shmooze" hooks his thumb in his cheek and then pantomimes reeling in a fish.

9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Let\'s Get Honest Abou... · 0 replies · +2 points

Given that the Germans themselves are a bit ambivalent about the terms Wiedervereinigung and Vereinigung and seem to officially prefer deutsche Einheit, the pot was stirred before Grass—and others—mentioned Anschluss.

9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Let\'s Get Honest Abou... · 0 replies · +1 points

Well let me see if I got this right....You think neighboring countries MIGHT "annihilate" them so instead you figure out a way for Israel's theocracy to "annihilate" them first. I am not sure you can see how insane that sounds.

It sounds like Mutual Assured Destruction to me. Not that it sounds sane, but it does describe if not guided US nuclear doctrine throughout the Cold War.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with Jack

People I'm following

Jack