![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
HumanPersonJr
105p2,844 comments posted · 21 followers · following 25
12 years ago @ Big Government - AOL/Huffpo Hosts Convi... · 0 replies · +2 points
12 years ago @ Big Government - AOL/Huffpo Hosts Convi... · 3 replies · 0 points
If you wish to claim, with no evidence, that Jesus is sending the debris field toward the wayward states, I would like to state, categorically, also with no evidence, that your theory is completely wrong.
13 years ago @ Big Government - Facts and Fallacies wi... · 0 replies · 0 points
13 years ago @ Big Government - ‘Lt Dan Band: For Th... · 0 replies · +4 points
This band are all heroes, because of the authentic due and support they give the most heroic of all...
13 years ago @ Big Government - 'Doobie' Brothers Ron ... · 0 replies · 0 points
Now, before we write another law, let us have a little talk with JESUS, let us tell him all about our troubles...
If God doesn't want a thing, our government must forbid it. Taliban L4S has SPOKEN, thank you Jesus. Are we not a constitutional theocracy?
13 years ago @ Big Government - Judges Gone Wild, Texa... · 0 replies · +19 points
13 years ago @ Big Government - Judges Gone Wild, Texa... · 0 replies · +29 points
I'm a non-spanker, which matters not one whit. I hope other non-spankers will realize this article isn't about the merits of spanking. It's about a judge gone wild over a (relatively) harmless form of discipline that he PERSONALLY doesn't endorse. Guess what, judge? It's not about your personal opinions!
Even if you don't believe spanking is a great thing, take the core of the article for what it is. No legislature has a moral right to pass no-spanking laws (and I understand that they, in this case, did not), and judges sure as HELL don't have a right to try to legislate any such law from the bench.
Very good article and well-written, to boot. lokobos's comment about appealing this dastardly ruling is right on target. If I had big money, I would be all over the place, supporting victims of these judges gone wild.
13 years ago @ Big Government - Reason.tv: Why Ask a L... · 0 replies · +2 points
As for the "ACT of homosexuality," that is none of your or Preacher Jones's business, as long as both individuals have reached their majority. By equating homosexuality and abortion, you show that you DON'T understand the Constitution, which is all about protecting rights, not depriving people of the right to freely associate.
It doesn't matter what your allegedly-divinely-inspired Bible says about homosexuals. We are not a theocracy. You'd make an excellent elder (or whatever an Islamic poobah is called) in the Taliban.
13 years ago @ Big Government - The Left Pushes Hard o... · 0 replies · +2 points
And when any one of us says Obama is a Socialist or a Communist, our own people call us down, saying that the rhetoric is incendiary. Not incendiary enough, in my book. These folks are truly disgusting. I really liked the picture of the "healthy" woman with a 16-ounce soft drink wedged in her hip pocket.
13 years ago @ Big Government - Monday Open Thread: Mc... · 0 replies · +1 points
I don't think it's chicken. They've sold millions of units of the stuff, and, apparently, they have accomplices in the government. Investigation proceeding forthwith. Excuse me while I adjust my hat, you know which one...
There's something damned fishy about this so-called chicken.
Opus