Tito, Hulk had a lot of adversity to overcome, but most was not his fault. I am biased because I am a Hulkamaniac but try to be objective. The divorce was not on him, his wife Linda was crazy and left him for an 18 year old who went to high school with Brooke. Hulk did cheat in 1995 one time and Linda accepted his apology. From what I have read, Hulk was a faithful husband besides the one transgression and an amazing father. His son' s accident was a terrible tragedy but it was an accident. Nick served a harsher sentence than 99 percent of the population would have, he was singled out and made an example of. Hulk made insensitive comments in conversations with Nick because he said he knew his son was at his breaking point and was trying to say anything to lift his spirits. In that instance, when you know your kid is hurting, you are not thinking about what comes out of your mouth, you want to take the pain away. Hulk was wrong with what he said, anyone else would have been given privacy. His remarks were taken out of context. The sex tape, racist words, all done in the privacy of his own home, he didn't know he was being recorded. Every person alive today has said things at home that would outrage people if made public. People record themselves having sex. Hulk won the gawker case because they invaded his privacy and were wrong to do so. Those things should not have been made public. Hulk is a victim of bad luck but he is not a bad person. The good blows away the bad.

Tito, is it official? You are done for sure in October? Is there hope that you could change your mind? So sad!!

Tito, great column. You are NOT leaving in November. 50 bucks a week for a column. Give me your paypal info. I am not kidding. I can't handle when I don't have anything to read!!

Tito, you can't leave!! I wont have any other columns to read and have been an avid fan for all of your 20 years. Name your price!! I will pay for your insightful writing. Well worth it for the great work you do and incredible entertainment provided! Don't go!

Ahhhhh, wow, you smartened me up, that makes a lot of sense. They would boo the hell out of her if she was too dominate. Why wasn't Goldberg booed then? You think because he was more of an unknown at the time when he was started?

Tito, you are not walking away in October. Please, I have so little!! That's the line Costanza Elaines psychic begging her not to use his secret name Seven for her baby. Ill put you on the payroll if I have to. We NEED YOU!!

Ive been reading your work since 1998 and still run to LOP after PPVs to read the review. I can't go to sleep until I know your thoughts!!! Long live TITO!!!

Tito, why did WWE bother to bring up Asuka if they were just going to kill her off. They wasted 2 years of build and managed to bury her in a few months. Goes on a 2 year winning streak and has lost twice since April, are they trying not to make money with her? Pritchard and Russo on interviews say wrestling is supposed to simulate a fight. Disco says this as well saying strikes are most important in a match. I am thinking as a casual fan, Ronda Rousey was a beast. In a shoot, wouldn't she destroy Nia Jax? I can see they are trying to make Ronda sell and look vulnerable to generate sympathy for her, but it doesn't make sense to me. Why wouldn't you book her as an unstoppable monster like they have done with Brock? Isn't she in theory the female version of Brock or Goldberg? Why book her differently? I don't think booking her this weak will be good for her. Curious to know your thoughts.

No, you are correct. He can be cumbersome and screw up spots in the ring. I am saying sure, he is not the best of the best. But considering who else they have? The way you feel about Jinder, I feel about Baron Corbin, they push him and he stinks. Loses the money in the bank briefcase and then is right in with the US title. I like seeing Jinder as opposed to the other options. So much talent is a waste, guys like Apollo Crews, Titus Oneill, the Assention, Revival, Jason Jordan, even Fin Balor. They are all great athletes who perform moves well. They can work in the ring and do all the physical aspects of a match. But they are not interesting characters, they are bland as bland can be. Its not enough to be good in the ring, people don't care about their character. Jinder I believe elicits emotion, people do not like the guy and I think he plays his role well. He is awkward in the ring at times yes, but I like watching him as opposed to the others because he does his job.

Oh and why do you think Jinder sucks? You see him as a poor wrestler with bad interviews? I think he is good in the ring, has an impressive look and can cut a decent promo, at least better than most on the roster. The guys these days do not look like action figures as they did in the past. They have a more lean, athletic build, not a ton of muscle mass. Jinder is a throwback in a way, he looks better than a lot of the wrestlers and I think it goes a long way to making the performance believable. I still laugh watching Triple H at 48 years old looks better than just about everyone.