Dunkterfunk
127p9,702 comments posted · 7 followers · following 1
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Patricia Kay Youngson:... · 0 replies · +1 points
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Patricia Kay Youngson:... · 2 replies · +8 points
The crash statistics are encouraging, but you are comparing 2 years to 2 months.
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Police investigating b... · 1 reply · +8 points
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Fearing bad winter, Bo... · 1 reply · +11 points
It is fantastic that your lifestyle allows you to bike everywhere. That is simply not the case for most people, no matter how this city council wants it to be true. People in-commute and that is not going to be replaced with bike traffic.
Boulder should definitely continue to make biking accessible and safe to encourage people to bike. However, most of us opposed this because it was blatantly at the expense of drivers and a clear case of ideology motivating this rather than clear facts.
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Fearing bad winter, Bo... · 0 replies · +7 points
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Fearing bad winter, Bo... · 0 replies · +28 points
Most of us like the goal of encouraging cycling. However, this was clearly designed to create traffic and thereby annoy people out of their cars. This is a pipe dream as most people who drive do so because they have to. It reminds me of the pipe dream thinking invading Iraq would turn it into a democracy that would act as a shining beacon to the middle east. Good end goal; wrong application and execution....same goes for right sizing.
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Fearing bad winter, Bo... · 0 replies · +33 points
I've got news for you. Unless everyone who works in Boulder also lives in Boulder, you will always be a city that uses cars as the primary mode of transportation. It is a great goal to encourage biking, but these poeple are living in a dream world.
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Jim Sawyer: George Wil... · 1 reply · +3 points
I am not really sure I have the answer for that. You are absolutely right, we have too many regulation even though many are well meaning. Of course, that does'nt cause me to believe government should stay completely out of the way of businesses.
Like most things there is not a black and white answer, which is why I sometimes side with Republicans and sometimes side with Dem...or often I hold a position that pisses off both :)
I think where there is an effective, market based incentive that is the way to go, but I think these companies need to be held accountable. Raising the price of a life saving drug 5000% is not only immoral, it should be illegal, just as price gouging during a natural disaster is. Its pretty hard to boycott a drug that will save your life.
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Editorial: The decline... · 0 replies · +3 points
Accidents happen and companies make mistakes, but if cars were knowingly sent out with defects that caused death then the people responsible should not just get fines.
9 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Jim Sawyer: George Wil... · 3 replies · +2 points
That said, capitalism is a human institution and as such has flaws. It is evident in the recent greed that caused a company to raise the price of its life saving bills over 5000%. It is evident in Volkswagen's emissions scandal.
I would argue we also don't have equal opportunity in this country when the cost of a college education is beyond the reach of so many. Therefore, I do not believe in capitalism that is free from regulation. Common sense regulation can help maintain the wonderful benefits of capitalism while protecting people from the greedy abuses we unfortunately see so often. Of course, regulations can go too far, but for the most part they are put in place in reaction to specific abuses, one being the predatory practices of lenders and credit card companies.