Unfortunately, your well intended admonishments probably won't help much. If the folks you're talking to are without power, then they can't read what you're writing. I appreciate your concern though.
de..de..deeee.......de..de..de...de..de...de.......dom..dom...dommm....dom ...dom..dom..dom....dom..dom.......de..de.de..de.deee.....yes! I hear it.
Sadly, he was the best politican money could buy at the time. The pickings are evidently getting worse. As much as I can't stand these present knuckleheads, could you even imagine having Sarah Palin lurking around the White House for the last 3 yrs. ?
I see he used the " I've done nothing and have no idea how to fix anything, but hey, I got Osama bin Laden didn't I " card. Yeah, great job.
".........the king swine himself, Mark Brown." Most likely after 3 prisoners named " Big Bubba" " Mondo" and " Hugh Louie " bend him over and make HIM " squeal like a pig " he may regret being such an arrogant little pr!ck.
Why do you hate us?? We polygamists find your hate filled comment most disturbing. Marriage is about the LOVE! not the property. Well, it is about the property,....but that's beside the point. If my wives could not only marry me, but each other then there shouldn't be a problem. Anyway, please stop with your hate. We demand the same rights as the Gays. Marriage is for everyone, not just Gays and hetero- monogimists.
Actually, JnC,it has quite a bit to do with the debate today. Soon our state Gov. will vote to re-define what a legal " marriage " is and in the process , of course, re-define WHO that new definition applies to. That's exactly what we are discussing. Marriage rights ,Marriage re-definition and who it can and should logically and rightfully include.
Now that we have redefined the terms and meanings of a " marriage " , then logically we shouldn't stop until we include everybody in any and all conceivable senarios, which would mean that any two or more willing and CONSENTING ADULTS should have the right to be married to each other no matter their sex , race, religion or physical relationship they might have to each other. To deny any adult for any reason should now be a violation of their legal and civil rights as a citizen of this state. Marriage rights are for everyone. Period. Anyone who would disagree with or deny these concenting adults their marriage rights would and should be concidered a bigot and hate monger.
Yes, and we have only ourselves to blame. In our Welfare, Sanctuary, Nanny State, with it's slap on the wrist laws, revolving door justice and ultra liberal hug a felon attitudes, this is what we get. It'll continue until we vote each and every useless miscreant out of Olympia and elect some real leader that will actually protect us, the citizens, with tougher laws.
As Grandpa use to tell us kids, " It didn't get ghetto 'cause too many white people moved in. " Grandpa was old school, I guess. That's bad, I'm sorry.
Hey Concerned Citizen, ever heard of a form of humor know as " being facetious "??
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Branch