You do realize that with each thumbs down you expose your own hypocrisy, right? Because you're saying: "No, we shouldn't be in our own lanes, you should believe like we want you to." Which is exactly what you claim the religious do to you.

But, sure, go ahead and try to force Christians, Jews, Muslims, Scientologists, and other religious people to adhere to something completely against the core of their being. Because religious persecution works out really, really well for the countries who try it.

It's a free country. You're free to side with Yoel Romero, or CM Punk. Me? I side with Yoel. Which is my right. And I get that many aren't going to agree with me, which is their right. Honestly, while I don't agree with the Supreme Court ruling, my concern isn't with gays getting married. Sure, I don't agree with the lifestyle, but it's THEIR lifestyle and has nothing to do with me. My concern is that they are going to force their lifestyle on me. How is it NOT hypocritical to say as a homosexual: "I should have the right to believe what I want and live how I want, without you trying to tell me different!" and then go into a Church or Christian business and try to tell them they don't have the right to believe what they want and live how they want, and if they don't go along with your marriage or wedding plans, you can shut them down?"

How is that the tolerance they say they espouse? It's not tolerance. It's bullying. And you know why it's bullying? I have still yet to see one Gay activist or couple, step foot in a Mosque or Muslim Bakery and demand marriage or service. Because a Muslim might hurt them, like they did over in Turkey today with the hoses and rubber guns. (And I don't think that's the treatment gays should receive, either.) I just think that it should be separate but equal. You stay in your lane. I'll stay in mine. You can get married. Now go get married in places where they will marry you, like Courthouses, Justices of the Peace, Wedding Chapels, etc...and stay in your lane. I will stay in mine. And we can both be free to believe and live how we please. You can keep saying I believe in a Fairy Tale about a Sky Ghost. I can say you're lost and need Jesus. We can both completely ignore each other until we die. Fair, no?

Go look up CM Punk vs. Dolph Ziggler.
CM Punk is a legit 6'2".
Dolph Ziggler is only a couple of inches shorter than him.
He's 6'0".

Rather than me being a mark, the problem is you're just misinformed.

That's crap. If the WWE never put titles on guys who were injured more than once, no one would ever be champion. How many injuries has Stone Cold, The Undertaker, HBK, Triple H, Randy Orton and more suffered through, and then got the strap put right back on them when they came back? Broken necks, Damaged spines, torn quads, concussions, snapped collar bones, and STILL they were given anywhere from 6 to 13 title reigns. When the WWE has anointed you a star, no amount of injury is going to stop them from giving you the belt, in fact, much like John Cena has shown on TV, and CM Punk has complained about, when you're a star and the champ, they expect you to work through it.

They don't like Dolph as a main eventer. They clearly never liked Daniel Bryan, they fired him for nothing, jobbed him in 18 seconds, held him out of the Rumble, on and on. The treatment is different because he wasn't an anointed one, just like Dolph Ziggler isn't.

And while I appreciate you saying I post a few intelligent posts on here (as do you), I would, ironically appreciate it if you didn't play that same intelligence by trying to act like you weren't intimating that Dolph wasn't to blame. I've heard the argument too many times, with people talking about Dolph's "breakneck style" (even from Stone Cold) as to say his concussions are his fault. When those concussions were a result of negligence from other wrestlers. If you want to say that's not what you were saying, then fine. We'll just leave it as I read your intent differently than what you meant.

And lastly, the Orton comparison is completely valid. Because if the WWE is afraid you're going to get another concussion and won't put the belt on you because of it, why is that fear there? Because if you get another concussion, you'll have to retire and they would have wasted their investment. If you are a problem wrestler and you've gotten multiple strikes and the WWE has to fire you per their own rules, clearly, you're going to be a wasted investment if they give you the title, but then you take another roid or smoke some weed or something. They lose you to termination just the same as they would to retirement. You're gone. You can't see the relation there? And that's what makes the WWE hypocritical.

It has nothing to do with "risk" it has everything to do with who they like.

You forgot "Theodore". If you're going to do the "I know his real name" thing, you have to do the WHOLE thing if it's available.

Like "John Felix Cena" or "Glen Thomas Jacobs" or "Steven James Anderson".

You gotta go hard, or go home.

Clearly, you're trying to make the point that it's Dolph's fault for not staying healthy so don't try to blame the WWE for not pushing him. You can try to rephrase your meaning after the fact, but it's clear as day what you're saying there. And it IS WWE's fault, because they could still push him if they wanted to.

The clearest point that invalidates your argument is Randy Orton. Here is a guy who was not injury prone, but was just a complete jackass and drug cheat who got himself nearly ousted from the company under their three strikes policy. Not only did the wipe away a strike on a technicality, but they created the Randy Orton Rule in order to get out from under having to fire a guy if he got a third strike. All this time, they were building him up with TWELVE World Title reigns.

If they wanted to, they could take the risk of Ziggler having an unfortunate injury again. Because that's a risk every superstar runs. Guaran-damn-tee, if Roman Reigns starts stacking up time-outs, they're not jobbing him out.

Could you imagine if the WWE brought back the Big Gold Belt and decided it was the new King of the Ring Championship belt?

How friggin sad is this?

What makes it more sad is realizing that TNA probably understands this is sad, but just can't afford to do anything about it.

He's 6'0

He's played a caddie, a cheerleader, a cougar's spoiled love interest, and is now the show-off (terrible gimmicks, none of which he chose for himself.), but certainly shows he's not one-dimensional.

Stale Moveset? I take it you don't even watch him wrestle.

Him winning the title the night after WM got one of the biggest pops of the modern era.

Just because he's not miserable about it, doesn't mean he doesn't deserve more.

Truest thing ever wrote.
Let's hope it doesn't end the same for him as it did for Christian.

No, that would actually be Jack Swagger's fault for kicking Dolph in the head too hard.
And then it would be Ryback's fault for cracking Dolph with a stiff clothesline, which led to Ryback getting depushed until he learned to work safer.

It's not as though Dolph concussed himself, so I don't know why you're trying to make it sound like people hitting him too hard is his fault.