DLoesch
74p14 comments posted · 2 followers · following 0
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - Did ESPN Allow Rapist ... · 10 replies · +4 points
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - Did ESPN Allow Rapist ... · 2 replies · +10 points
That I responded to someone after a series of comments doesn't constitute me fighting with anyone. Am I not afforded the luxury of commenting in self defense without being accused of untruths? Expectations run both ways.
The response here have been beyond over the top and the only way it can be justified is if:
A) I censored comments, which I don't
B) I said that criticism over a typo is unjustified
All I ever said, for the fourth time now, is that the outrage is unequal to the offense and I believe it's driven by one individual's personal dislike of me rather than devotion to this website. That's all.
You can disagree, but the theatrics demonstrated in this thread are unlike anything I've ever seen. A couple of people have devoted more attention towards this than the actual topic and thus have brilliantly underscored the entire point of my article, which was serendipitous.
I've still yet to see these individuals actually comment on Tyson or ESPN, btw. All fascinating.
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - Did ESPN Allow Rapist ... · 1 reply · +10 points
On the other side, it's not a double standard to ask an individual why their selective outrage doesn't match the offense and question their motivation behind it. ;)
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - Did ESPN Allow Rapist ... · 5 replies · +15 points
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - Did ESPN Allow Rapist ... · 12 replies · +17 points
For the third time, I merely pointed out that you are commenting an awful lot on a typo and I suspect you're obsessive with it because you genuinely dislike me. You've since employed theatrics and accused me of "driving people away." Because I responded at length for the first time today? So am I not allowed to comment? What was it you said about being selective?
I've been far more generous with what goes on in comments here than the editors of the other Big sites are with theirs and don't plan on changing that policy, so no, don't get dramatic with me and threaten to take your ball and go home over a false accusation of coddled criticism. It's hubris. Dislike me all you want, it's your right, but make the outrage equal to that of the offense if you expect me to take you seriously.
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - Did ESPN Allow Rapist ... · 4 replies · +10 points
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - Did ESPN Allow Rapist ... · 3 replies · +13 points
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - Did ESPN Allow Rapist ... · 14 replies · +20 points
This has nothing to do with it. I'm looking at at least ten (more? I didn't count.) comments from you on one thing in one story. Again, "thick skin?" You don't need to get macho with me and make false accusations on my character simply because I noted that you have spent an inordinate amount of your morning obsessing over a typo in one article. It's been corrected, I suggest you move on unless your goal is to make honest my interpretation of your actions. Best.
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - Did ESPN Allow Rapist ... · 67 replies · +21 points
13 years ago @ Big Journalism - The Gladney-ization of... · 1 reply · +4 points