Researching Biometrics- a precursor to say the least. - Keep your eyes upon what is now known as the RFID
( Radio Frequency Identification ) chip. In the testimony of Jesus Christ (Revelation 1:2 ) the mark of the beast is described as a mark on the right hand or in the forehead. (Rev. 13:16-18) "An object placed upon" an individual. It is created by man for it is "humanity's number".

RFID chips are currently being used in many things and is being used within the new passports. With the correct equipment your information and digital picture within can be accessed by anyone "from a distance". A huge violation of our Constitutional Rights.

I am a firm believer in educating others, and Shouting the Truth from the Roof Tops! Should the RFID chip cease to exist - I would not be opposed to such a measure. I turn my back to a cashless society which will usher such radical and extreme technology in. Furthermore, I believe in good old CASH. Thought I would share. Have a wonderful and productive week!!

UPDATE: I posted an e-mail that a personal friend sent me earlier- apparently there is more to the story. I apologize for any confusion. Here is the follow up to what I posted earlier. Thanks.

This entire article for the following excerpt can be found at www.worldnetdaily.com

Posted: March 21, 2009
12:15 am Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
A military commander at Fort Campbell in Kentucky demanded his soldiers give him the registration numbers of any guns they own privately and then reveal where they are stored.
The order was stopped, according to base officials, when it was discovered the commander was not "acting within his authority."
The original order was issued on the letterhead of Charlie Company, 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment and said effective March 11, (see copy below) any soldier with a "privately owned weapon" was required to submit the information, along with any information about any concealed carry permit the soldier may have, and what state issued the permit.
Further, the rule warned, "If any soldier comes into possession of a Privately Owned Weapon following the effective date of this memorandum, he is required to inform the Chain of Command of the above information."
One soldier who objected to the demands circulated the memo, commenting that he lives off post.
Further, the rule warned, "If any soldier comes into possession of a Privately Owned Weapon following the effective date of this memorandum, he is required to inform the Chain of Command of the above information."
One soldier who objected to the demands circulated the memo, commenting that he lives off post.
"It just seems a little coincidental to me that within 90 days the most anti-firearm president in history is inaugurated, some of the nastiest anti-firearm laws are put on the table in Washington, and then the Army comes around wanting what amounts to a registration on all firearms, even if they are off post, and doesn't provide any reason or purpose as to why," the soldier said.
Base spokeswoman Cathy Gramling told WND the letter apparently was a mistake. She said the base requires anyone bringing a privately owned weapon onto the installation to register it.
"As a response to a number of negligent discharges of privately owned weapons, the command decided to explore how to implement a training program for soldiers with privately owned weapons. Their goal is to identify soldiers with firearms and provide additional safety training to them, much like our motorcycle and driver safety classes," she said.
"Our soldiers train and operate in combat with M-4 carbines and various other military weapons, but not all who purchase their own weapons are properly trained to handle them. Determining which soldiers possess weapons will allow the command to identify the soldiers who may require additional training on them," she said.
Gramling said the memo was "from a subordinate unit commander who, at the time, believed he was acting within his authority." She said requiring the information was halted when it was discovered the commander was not within his authority.
The process has been suspended pending a full review, she said.
COPY OF MEMO"

UPDATE: I posted an e-mail that a personal friend sent me earlier- apparently there is more to the story. I apologize for any confusion. Here is the follow up to what I posted earlier. Thanks.

This entire article for the following excerpt can be found at www.worldnetdaily.com

Posted: March 21, 2009
12:15 am Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
A military commander at Fort Campbell in Kentucky demanded his soldiers give him the registration numbers of any guns they own privately and then reveal where they are stored.
The order was stopped, according to base officials, when it was discovered the commander was not "acting within his authority."
The original order was issued on the letterhead of Charlie Company, 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment and said effective March 11, (see copy below) any soldier with a "privately owned weapon" was required to submit the information, along with any information about any concealed carry permit the soldier may have, and what state issued the permit.
Further, the rule warned, "If any soldier comes into possession of a Privately Owned Weapon following the effective date of this memorandum, he is required to inform the Chain of Command of the above information."
One soldier who objected to the demands circulated the memo, commenting that he lives off post.
Further, the rule warned, "If any soldier comes into possession of a Privately Owned Weapon following the effective date of this memorandum, he is required to inform the Chain of Command of the above information."
One soldier who objected to the demands circulated the memo, commenting that he lives off post.
"It just seems a little coincidental to me that within 90 days the most anti-firearm president in history is inaugurated, some of the nastiest anti-firearm laws are put on the table in Washington, and then the Army comes around wanting what amounts to a registration on all firearms, even if they are off post, and doesn't provide any reason or purpose as to why," the soldier said.
Base spokeswoman Cathy Gramling told WND the letter apparently was a mistake. She said the base requires anyone bringing a privately owned weapon onto the installation to register it.
"As a response to a number of negligent discharges of privately owned weapons, the command decided to explore how to implement a training program for soldiers with privately owned weapons. Their goal is to identify soldiers with firearms and provide additional safety training to them, much like our motorcycle and driver safety classes," she said.
"Our soldiers train and operate in combat with M-4 carbines and various other military weapons, but not all who purchase their own weapons are properly trained to handle them. Determining which soldiers possess weapons will allow the command to identify the soldiers who may require additional training on them," she said.
Gramling said the memo was "from a subordinate unit commander who, at the time, believed he was acting within his authority." She said requiring the information was halted when it was discovered the commander was not within his authority.
The process has been suspended pending a full review, she said.
COPY OF MEMO"

HEADS UP-

This is a personal e-mail from a friend. Take it for what you will, but something stinks about it if you ask me.

e-mail- " Something BIG is going on ALL ACTIVE DUTY MEMBERS HEADS UP..!!
Gentlemen,
I am an 11B (infantry) currently assigned at Fort Campbell. I live off post, with my firearms, (which I don't bring on post for any reason). A very frightening thing happened at work yesterday. I was ordered to fill out a list containing my firearm information. This included make, model, caliber, and serial number of all firearms I currently posses.
In addition, I was also required to list registration information, location of all weapons individually, and information regarding any CCW permits I posses. If you are like me, then the people you work with know you have firearms. So I had to list at least some. I tried to talk to my 1sg (who is normally approachable through proper channels) to find out what this is for, and I was basically told, "I don't give a !&@%, just put your info on the form."
I don't know how high this goes, but I am hearing that this is going on in other units at Fort Campbell as well. It just seems a little coincidental to me that within 90 days: the most anti-firearm President in history is inaugurated, some of the nastiest anti-firearm laws are put on the table in Washington, and then the Army comes around wanting what amounts to a registration on all firearms, even if they are off post, and doesn't provide any reason or purpose as to why.
I fear something really nasty is blowing in the wind here. I have been in almost 8 years, and never have any of my units asked for this information. If any of you out there have any info as to what all this crap is about please chime in. Otherwise consider yourself warned. I have already posted this on every other firearm forum I am a member of to get the word out. "

HEADS UP-

This is a personal e-mail from a friend. Take it for what you will, but something stinks about it if you ask me.

e-mail- " Something BIG is going on ALL ACTIVE DUTY MEMBERS HEADS UP..!!
Gentlemen,
I am an 11B (infantry) currently assigned at Fort Campbell. I live off post, with my firearms, (which I don't bring on post for any reason). A very frightening thing happened at work yesterday. I was ordered to fill out a list containing my firearm information. This included make, model, caliber, and serial number of all firearms I currently posses.
In addition, I was also required to list registration information, location of all weapons individually, and information regarding any CCW permits I posses. If you are like me, then the people you work with know you have firearms. So I had to list at least some. I tried to talk to my 1sg (who is normally approachable through proper channels) to find out what this is for, and I was basically told, "I don't give a !&@%, just put your info on the form."
I don't know how high this goes, but I am hearing that this is going on in other units at Fort Campbell as well. It just seems a little coincidental to me that within 90 days: the most anti-firearm President in history is inaugurated, some of the nastiest anti-firearm laws are put on the table in Washington, and then the Army comes around wanting what amounts to a registration on all firearms, even if they are off post, and doesn't provide any reason or purpose as to why.
I fear something really nasty is blowing in the wind here. I have been in almost 8 years, and never have any of my units asked for this information. If any of you out there have any info as to what all this crap is about please chime in. Otherwise consider yourself warned. I have already posted this on every other firearm forum I am a member of to get the word out. "

This administration has said they want to divide Jerusalem in order to create a Palestine state. It is referred to in the news as " The Middle East Peace Process".

Isn't it interesting that everybody wants the Hebrews to give up their land for "peace" , however the Palestine's have yet to be asked or to offer up their land for this so called Peace process.

" And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed " Genesis 12: 3

Dividing Jerusalem is down the path that wisdom will not follow.

Have you heard about the "hate crime" bill H.R. 1913 that is in our Congress and up for a vote on April 29th?

Not only is It totally biased, but due to its lack of definition it will also protect pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism and even sex with corpses. "The Democrats who introduced the bill admitted that this bill is designed to protect a special group of politically-correct individuals (gays, lesbians, transgender individuals) and not all Americans. "

Currently we already have "hate crime" laws in place today in all 50 states, as we should, for ALL Americans.

As the bill is written (poorly I might add) H.R 1913 A pastor’s sermon (preached according to God's Word) could be considered “hate speech” under this legislation if heard by an individual who then acts aggressively against persons based on any “sexual orientation.” The pastor could be prosecuted for “conspiracy to commit a hate crime.” (Hmmm, according to H.R 1913, molesting a child isn't considered "hate"- but if you preach that mankind's sinful desires are wrong in God's eyes.. then oh that's hate. )

"Rep. Gohmert offered several amendments to protect religious freedom and free speech. These were voted down by the Democrats.

During the debate, Republicans offered numerous amendments to add new classes of individuals who should be protected by any hate crime law. They offered amendments that included protecting: pregnant women, unborn children, senior citizens, military personnel, and American nationals threatened targeted by illegal aliens. All of these amendments were quickly voted down. Rep. Gohmert offered an amendment to add the death penalty to the hate crimes bill. This was voted down, too. "

These are just the facts. Please contact your Senators and tell them to vote NO on this bill. We already have a hate crime bill which protects all Americans.

CajunBlackjack- Be you! Who cares what other peoples "assumptions" are. I too am Proud to be a 9.12er, and as I have heard Glenn Beck say.. " Call me CrAzy.." but I am who I am, and I am honored to be called a Tea Bagger- because I KNOW that I love my Country. :)

Interesting. I read the article Hanna S. Thanks for sharing! Those who did not attend a Tea Party are not a reliable source for information regarding the Tea Parties.
"disaffection for government" Well Axelrod obviously does not understand that Law abiding American Citizens are wanting to ENFORCE the Laws of our Government! People want the Laws of our Constitution Enforced- not Manipulated.

The Constitution wasn't meant to be changed according to men's opinions. It was meant to be enforced and a guideline for amendments.

Where is honor, integrity, and justice in those who were elected to uphold our laws and enforce them??

Racist Tea Parties? My question of course is- What evidence have those who are hostile toward the truth provided in order to determine that any of the tea parties were "racist" ? Without evidence it is merely SLANDER.

All I witnessed was "wanna be journalists" who stood there and accused law abiding citizens and children of doing something wrong- because they had a mike in there hand, and a camera pointed at them. No journalistic integrity at all.
It really is amazing to me that those who publicly accuse and slander us simply because we disagree with bad decisions have NO IDEA WHAT THE MEANING OF RACIST IS. Man- " Ignorance is not bliss. "

For those of us that were publicly accused of being an extremist etc. you should check this video out. The Truth Shall Set You Free.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HN_NCmxLZzU