Kaete

Kaete

116p

12 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0

10 years ago @ The Toast - "Please correct": Edit... · 0 replies · +11 points

How do you respond? How can you respond? And how can you teach your children to respond?

Last night I read a heartbreaking article on the surge in bullying of Muslim children in schools. My son is only three years old, but he shares a small part of the Bernardino's shooter's name. It's right there, lovingly stenciled on his lunchbox and shoes and coat and hat that he takes to school with him every day. It's only a matter of time until the other kids are old enough to read it. What will happen then? Even as adults, we struggle to respond to open hatred and racism. How do you deal with sending your kid off to school, knowing it will happen to him, eventually?

You can try an insulate your family as well as you can. Try to pick the "right" town with as mixed demographics as possible, that sort of thing. But even the old belief that trying to stick to the Northeast would provide a little protection is proving futile, as much of the worst rhetoric and blatantly racist actions are coming straight from the Northeastern states. Trump and his crazy friends may eventually froth away, but they'll leave the groundswell of Islamophobia that they're building. So. He'll have to deal with it at some point.

I do know that the human brain is awful at dealing with novel, negative situations. This is why we have a dreadful response time in emergencies, and why things like the bystander effect leave us standing like deer in headlights when faced with things like disasters, crime, and open racism. So perhaps we need to PRACTICE dealing with racism with our children. My heart freezes up at the idea of roleplaying dealing with a racist classmate (or worse, adult) with my baby, but I need to look at it like practicing Stop Drop and Roll for fire safety or other basic safety drills.

The problem is that there's nice, easy to remember sound bites and actions to remember for dealing with fire. There's no Stop Drop and Roll for racism, no government organizations helping us cut the emergency up into manageable pieces to remember and deal with. For very little children I would think the focus should be on disengagement, seeking safety, and reporting. But as our kids grow into teenagers, should we change the drills to give other tools as well? Not saying that people HAVE to confront racism, but giving them the practice so that they can confront it if they choose to, and aren't blindsided into muteness by surprise?

I don't know any of the answers. These are just the things that keep me staring at the ceiling at night after the three year old needs a 4:30 am potty break.

10 years ago @ The Toast - From The Readers: The ... · 0 replies · +15 points

That one is potentially realistic. Small children are very vulnerable to heat stroke, and attics can reach 120 to 130 degrees easily.

10 years ago @ The Toast - Things I Wish I Could ... · 4 replies · +36 points

It's a running joke in my husband's family that they're building a small model UN because all the cousins happened to marry spouses from different continents, but I can see how it could be super annoying coming from outside the family!

My sis-in-law and I both get the "oh, you're not the baby sitter?" comment, which I always find surprising. I will admit I take perverse pleasure in answering "Where's his dad from?" with a cheery, "Oh, New Jersey!" But then I generally relent and add in "but his parents are from Bangladesh" just because it gives me an excuse to mention Bangladesh, as most Americans do not know it even exists.

I am probably a bad person for not minding the "mixed kids are so cute" comments despite the train car of racist baggage behind it because yeah, doy, all the kids in my extended family are crazy cute. ;)

10 years ago @ The Toast - Link Roundup! · 0 replies · +7 points

" Cotton Babies, the maker of bumGenius diapers, runs a 70-person packing facility in St. Louis where employees are paid living wages, can bring their babies to work and get 26 days of paid leave a year."

WOW. If I try cloth diapers with my next baby, I'm definitely going to give these guys a try.

10 years ago @ The Toast - Helen Cho, Age of ... · 0 replies · +1 points

Hard to talk about my feelings fully without spoilers - let's just say I thought they were going to go a direction plotwise that was going to leave me very upset, but I was so happy to see that they did not!

Heh, so vague, but hopefully you guys know what I'm talking about. :)

10 years ago @ The Toast - Helen Cho, Age of ... · 3 replies · +22 points

I'm pretty sure she was sterilized in the comics as well, so it's not like this development came out of the blue.

However, that being said, if the comics depicted her as a monster because she was infertile, that wouldn't be an excuse for the movies to do so as well - it would still be a misogynistic move.

Personally? I just can't get that reading out of the scene at all. Black Widow's defining characteristic is her regret over her past crimes. Listen to her voice when she says "kill easily, think you're the only monster?" Natasha thinks she's a monster because even though she's probably on the side of the "good" guys now, she still kills more easily (emotionally) than anyone else on the team. She regards her sterilization as just another symptom of her creation, not the cause.

If you get something else from the scene, hey, half of art is interpretation so your view is just as valid as mine.

As for her sterilization in the comic, I think one of her writers (in the comics) has an interview snippet worth sharing:

Question: Why was it important to you to have Black Widow unable to have children? How was this part of telling a feminist story about her, in your mind? Did you worry that this was reducing Natasha to just her fertility or lack thereof? And what was your solution?

Richard K. Morgan: "That narrative thread actually emerged not from any specific interest in children on Natasha’s part — my sense of the character is that she’s probably not keen on the idea — but because one of her fellow Widows was trying to have kids and had run up against the Red Room biotech that prevented it. So when Natasha finds this out, it’s almost a casual blow. But what’s telling, I think, is her reaction; there are no tears, no mawkishness, no collapse into becoming womanly distress — she’s just very (and dangerously) angry. And it’s important to realise why she’s angry — it’s not because she necessarily wants kids. She’s pissed off because she’s had the choice taken away.

... See, most women I’ve ever met either already have or at some point want kids, but there are still significant numbers who don’t, or at least don’t right now. But those variations are beside the point — the real point is that among all those women, having or wanting kids or not, I never met a single one who didn’t want the choice. Ultimately, I think, that’s what feminism is about — building a world in which women’s choices are not circumvented by someone (male) else’s agenda."

11 years ago @ The Toast - Link Roundup · 1 reply · +20 points

The only best friend I ever broke up with happened to be a guy who wanted to go romantic, so fortunately that followed the regular pop culture break up narrative.

But straight up friendship breakups? There really does need to be more support out there. My husband was unceremoniously dropped by his best friend of a decade and he was completely at a loss. Not only did he have to deal with the whole I'm-male-I-shouldn't-show-emotions problems most guys have, but there's none of the normal rituals to smooth the way like listening to break up songs or rebound dating. Poor guy was shocked that it made him feel like crap for a really long time too - people expect to feel shaken up after their girlfriend dumps them, but don't realize how long the pain can linger from a friendship ending.

I kept telling him, "You know how they say it takes a week to feel better for every month you were dating someone you broke up with? Well, this was a real relationship too, even if it wasn't dating. It was ten years, you're not going to just "get over it" that quickly!"

11 years ago @ The Toast - Dream-Casting The Live... · 0 replies · +18 points

Oh Gargoyles, I was SO obsessed with you. I even printed out pictures from the internet and made my own buttons to decorate my school backpack. And my first exposure to fanfiction! Ah, those were the days.

11 years ago @ The Toast - Don't You Dare Try To ... · 8 replies · +93 points

Never had an urge to punch art, but at the British Museum I surprised myself with an incredible urge to physically drag away a tourist that was clambering all over a FIVE THOUSAND year old statue so her friend could take a picture.

I was slightly horrified that they didn't have better protection for the artwork.

11 years ago @ The Toast - Porkistan · 2 replies · +18 points

Ah, the pork problem!

When I married my (Muslim) husband, I also knew more about Islam than he did. My general love for history and religious studies meant I had taken three Islamic-themed classes at college, while his family is only mildly religious - imagine Christians who really only see the inside of a church for weddings and funerals, and you get the idea. The one thing his family definitely does follow though, is the no pork rule.

I had no problem going along with the no-piggies rule because I'm one of those oddballs who has always detested bacon, since I was a wee little girl, nor did I care for porkchops or most other variations of pork. Also, pigs are a little too intelligent to make me completely comfortable eating them all the time. The ONLY exemption was my mother's Easter Ham, which I told my husband that I definitely would not give up. ;)

So, I had no problem not eating pork as I didn't like it - but then we had a son. And there was no way I was going to go telling a child "We don't eat pork because of our religion." Uh, no. What I will tell him, when he's old enough to understand it, is that "culturally your family doesn't eat pork because waaaaay in the past, people didn't know how to eat pork without getting sick, so they told everyone to not eat it - and we're just copying them out of respect. But you can choose to eat whatever you want."

To be honest, sometimes I suspect my husband's family follows the no-pork rule because they are so irreligious in most other respects that it's just an easy way to feel culturally connected. And I do know in my husband's case, it's entirely a food aversion - he just thinks it's really gross, like you or I might feel about eating bugs, and nothing to do with any religious effect on the eater.