gdp's Comments

Malay Mail : ‘We vomit’ on Charlie Hebdo’s sudden friends, staff cartoonist says | World | Mala

Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:45:10 +0000

Or both sides are evil. One just likes to use bullets and bombs.

Conservative Victory 2012 : House GOP to distribute draft contempt citation against Holder over gunwalking scandal

Thu, 3 May 2012 15:27:24 +0000

On one hand you have one dead US border agent, hundreds of dead Mexicans, and US guns allowed to be used through a US government operation. On the other hand, you have Attorney General Eric Holder who goes before Congress with arrogance, demanding to know why he's being pulled away to answer so many questions on these issues. The man deserves more than a formal declaration of contempt. At best, assuming he knew nothing, he should be removed from his position for being incompetent in the handling of the punishment of the guilty under his command. Of course, I'm not sure who actually believes he knew nothing of Fast and Furious as it was happening. I know I don't.

Big Journalism : Limbaugh Apologizes to Birth Control Subsidy Shill

Sun, 4 Mar 2012 00:41:30 +0000

Or perhaps he needs a ton of real callers on Monday telling him he was right.

Big Journalism : Limbaugh Apologizes to Birth Control Subsidy Shill

Sun, 4 Mar 2012 00:11:57 +0000

I wish he didn't apologize. Liberals started this mess by demanding that the public be forced to finance their sexual exploits while mocking religious arguments against this mandate. If you are going to demand money from the public, you should hear what the public has to say. In this case, some people think that, if you demand $3,000 per year per woman solely for contraception, then you just might be a slut. Cry me a river. Besides, liberals were just telling us awhile ago that being a "slut" wasn't something bad -- in fact, they were holding "slut-walks" where they dressed like "sluts" to protest police warnings that dressing in such a manner might encourage rapists to target them. If there is nothing wrong with living this way, why is the word still insulting to them?

Breitbart.tv : Palin Torches Obama: 'Naive Apology To Savages'

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 20:30:13 +0000

Bwahahaha! An Obama supporter talking about what it takes to be President -- that's hilarious!

Breitbart.tv : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:36:26 +0000

I can't believe this. I'm completely surprised. There must be more on this. What happened?

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:46:11 +0000

It is simple, but you're advocating for murder. There is no right for a woman to choose to murder her child.

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:43:04 +0000

Well said, sir. You choose to follow what the court said; I choose to follow what I believe God said. So from where do our rights come?

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:43:24 +0000

But you're not free to violate the rights of an unborn child.

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:41:56 +0000

Muslims do say that all the time (although they don't even follow their own rules that they want to force upon the masses, but I digress). I actually expect people to be hardcore over their religion. That it sounds silly to you that I advocate my religious beliefs only indicates you aren't understanding it. Religion is supposed to represent someone's core beliefs. If I firmly believe that God has given us a standard by which to live, and I firmly believe he will bless the nation who chooses to serve him and follow his ways, why wouldn't I advocate this to all people everywhere? Perhaps you should be asking for evidence instead of simply saying that all religious answers are discounted. It takes someone pretty hardcore to say that he will ignore a religious position for being a religious position when it is simply stating the obvious that murdering a child is wrong

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:36:01 +0000

It makes you sound like a moron to be debating the fine points of the legality of murder. I have provided my legal reasoning, and demonstrated the ignorance of the Supreme Court in its ruling. Even if the murder of the unborn was entirely legal and in perfect accordance with the laws of the land, some laws are immoral and do not deserve recognition by the people.

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:36:29 +0000

The Declaration of Independence didn't even begin to attempt to enumerate them all, but considered it sufficient to attempt to name three and only in a very general sense. I believe rights can and should be enumerated from the Bible. Are you trying to get me to enumerate them all?

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:18:42 +0000

Logic isn't your strong suit obviously, although that's a given since you can't distinguish between two very separate people. When you can first define "personhood," then we can perhaps look at deciding when it starts. Hidden in your question is a reference to the notion that we can arbitrarily kill humans who are an inconvenience to us as long as they aren't "persons." Frankly, it is quite disconcerting that there are people who still advocate this sort of backwards thinking. Secondly, you might be correct that there is no universally accepted consensus on this subject, but what would that mean? Since when does consensus imply something is a fact? Abortion is illegal under the section I showed you in the Constitution, per your request, particularly when coupled with already-passed laws. The Supreme Court did not rule according to the Constitution in Row vs Wade, and it was not the first time it failed to rule according to the Constitution. If you want to be a strict follower of the Constitution, the Supreme Court does not have the right to make new laws -- it must simply rule on what is and is not constitutional. I do expect all people to respect human life. Yes, it is my belief, and I will proclaim it by exercising my right to speak in public.

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:01:53 +0000

Why not? Am I missing something with your understanding of the term "right?" You might want to just come out with your gotcha scenario and see what I believe. Now out with it -- from where do our rights come?

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:37:40 +0000

Why wouldn't they apply to all human beings? Now out with it -- from where do our rights come?

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:34:51 +0000

For the third time, the name is DavidC99. Do you suffer from an illness that detracts from your ability to concentrate on what you read? "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:22:58 +0000

Why don't you tell me from where rights come then?

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:18:55 +0000

Abortion is forbidden by the Constitution and applicable law, but a far left-wing set of judges voted against the Constitution on the basis of their own personal agenda. You seem to have everything backwards. Why don't you show me in the Constitution where it says that a woman can murder her child?

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:02:09 +0000

A supreme court ruling that black is white and white is black doesn't make it so. Rights come from the Creator, not from government.

Big Journalism : Ed Schultz Falsely States Transvaginal Ultrasounds Are Mandated In VA Law

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:00:49 +0000

For the second time, try to focus and realize with whom you're arguing. The Constitution does not attempt to protect any such imagined right of a woman to harm her child. On the contrary, laws are put in place to ensure child abuse does not happen. Nevertheless, I have to ask -- would you be so stupid as to argue that the Constitution does trump moral obligations? Does your conscience still work, or did you sear it with a hot iron?