<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Tony Sidaway's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/1124361</link>
		<description>Comments by Tony Sidaway</description>
<item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Prematurely Praised On Gay Rights, Queen Elizabeth II To Sign Anti-Discrimination Charter</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/1-after-being-lectured-on-gay-rights-queen-elizabeth-ii-to-sign-anti-discrimination-charter/politics/2013/03/09/62271#IDComment591120530</link>
<description>If it&amp;#039;s that easy, I look forward to seeing the Queen signing a piece of paper condemning the death penalty throughout the Commonwealth. This too is a scandal with which her crown continues to be associated. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/1-after-being-lectured-on-gay-rights-queen-elizabeth-ii-to-sign-anti-discrimination-charter/politics/2013/03/09/62271#IDComment591120530</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atheist Revolution : Lessons From the Justin Vacula Debacle</title>
<link>http://www.atheistrev.com/2012/10/lessons-from-justin-vacula-debacle.html#IDComment464147398</link>
<description>If I understand the update correctly, Justin Vacula has confirmed that he knowingly posted on the hate site in response to an invitation. If his tweet in response to Jen&amp;#039;s announcement doesn&amp;#039;t strike you as grossly inappropriate for anyone in the position Justin Vacula aspires to, I can&amp;#039;t help you.  I&amp;#039;m dismayed at the determined attempts to excuse and accommodate such behaviour within what is supposed to be an inclusive movement. The air of sanctimony and victim-blaming is corrosive. I have watched events since mid-2011 with mounting disgust.  The resistance by Justin Vacula and some other members of the movement to reasonable, decent social norms is unsupportable. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atheistrev.com/2012/10/lessons-from-justin-vacula-debacle.html#IDComment464147398</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Same-Sex Marriage: HRC Wants Your Wedding Registry To Be Their Cash Cow?</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/same-sex-marriage-hrc-wants-your-wedding-registry-to-be-their-cash-cow/news/2011/07/08/23283#IDComment171260773</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t get the problem here. I&amp;#039;m in a straight marriage, have been for more than 25 years and it&amp;#039;s been one of the greatest experiences of my life. If you had asked me on my wedding day in 1985 whether I supported the right of all people to marry whoever they want, irrespective of gender, I would have said &amp;quot;yes please&amp;quot; and if there had been a campaign out there to promote that idea I would have considered asking my guests to consider those who are legally barred from marrying and donate to the cause of marriage equality.    So, what has changed in the past 26 years? Is it because now those campaigns exist and are achieving amazing success? I just don&amp;#039;t get it. Why beat up organisations that present those of us who respect marriage the opportunity to promote organisations that want to give the choice of marriage to everybody?    We should all be doing this! There is a vast constituency of straight and bisexual people who want marriage and therefore understand why some same-sex couples want that too. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jul 2011 21:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/same-sex-marriage-hrc-wants-your-wedding-registry-to-be-their-cash-cow/news/2011/07/08/23283#IDComment171260773</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Same-Sex Marriage: HRC Wants Your Wedding Registry To Be Their Cash Cow?</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/same-sex-marriage-hrc-wants-your-wedding-registry-to-be-their-cash-cow/news/2011/07/08/23283#IDComment171131412</link>
<description>Don&amp;#039;t mistake me, if this sounds cynical it&amp;#039;s because I am cynical about your criticism: are you just bashing HRC because they thought of the idea first?  I think this is a very sensible way to raise campaigning funds. Nobody is forced to donate to them, but weddings are a great time for a couple to ask their guests to consider donating to an organisation working in the field of marriage equality. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jul 2011 14:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/same-sex-marriage-hrc-wants-your-wedding-registry-to-be-their-cash-cow/news/2011/07/08/23283#IDComment171131412</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atheist Revolution : How Worried Should We Be About Offending Christians?</title>
<link>http://www.atheistrev.com/2011/02/how-worried-should-we-be-about.html#IDComment128652574</link>
<description>I hardly ever talk about religion and most people who have neu me probably don&amp;#039;t know whether or not I have a religion. Maybe that&amp;#039;s an English thing. A very close friend who has never been religious recently came to me for help selecting a religion. After some discussion about core beliefs (very stringent, she won&amp;#039;t accept a sexist, homophobic or anti-abortion faith, so there isn&amp;#039;t a lot of wriggle room) she asked me to help her to contact the local Quakers, which I&amp;#039;m very happy to do.  Religious people can be incredibly sensitive, though. For instance there was an incredible fuss recently about some signs that simply said you can be &amp;quot;Good without God&amp;quot; and gave contact information for a humanist group. Miley Cyrus&amp;#039;s father was apparently freaked out by a sign in California simply announcing &amp;quot;Atheists United.&amp;quot; What can you do?  Making fun of religious beliefs is the most offensive thing you can do, but I don&amp;#039;t see the point of privileging them. Atheism is as welcome as a fart in a lift. It&amp;#039;s inevitable. My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/twitter.com\/TonySidaway\/statuses\/38178107210989568&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;TonySidaway-  @glynmoody if twitter starts to fill up with crap like deckly Im out of here Enforced brevity is its only advantage over rss&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atheistrev.com/2011/02/how-worried-should-we-be-about.html#IDComment128652574</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Keith Olbermann Swims With The Current. Current TV, That Is.</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/keith-olbermann-swims-with-the-current-current-tv-that-is/media/2011/02/07/17284#IDComment126619953</link>
<description>I wish Keith Olbermann success in anything he decides to do next. I&amp;#039;ve enjoyed his work at MSNBC since I first encountered his show when, as a Brit in London, I decided to follow the exciting 2008 US elections.  Although my cable company doesn&amp;#039;t supply MSNBC I&amp;#039;m able to download the daily podcast versions of all the shows or else stream them from the site. I&amp;#039;m a very keen fan of Rachel Maddow&amp;#039;s show. I get Current on cable here but I believe it&amp;#039;s a localized version that would be unlikely to take up a show about US politics (though I think that&amp;#039;s a short-sighted attitude.)  Elsewhere someone noted that a couple of internet domain names related to &amp;quot;Keith Olbermann Show&amp;quot; were registered a couple of days before Keith left MSNBC. I hope that means there will be streamable Keith content in the future. I miss him. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Feb 2011 05:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/keith-olbermann-swims-with-the-current-current-tv-that-is/media/2011/02/07/17284#IDComment126619953</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Grim Reaper Writes : Hotel owners, the gay couple and a damaging equality law</title>
<link>http://thegrimreaperwrites.blogspot.com/2011/01/hotel-owners-gay-couple-and-damaging.html#IDComment124250163</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t think you can really fault the law. It&amp;#039;s all very well saying that the market will take care of it but we had &amp;quot;no blacks, no Irish&amp;quot; signs up until they were outlawed, and the Rachman case in the 1960s showed that leaving the market to take care of it simply drove West Indians into the arms of a slum landlord. Markets are shitty like that, they don&amp;#039;t give a fuck about human rights.  Which is why you need to have laws to enforce rights.  Libertarianism is a game for rich kids who want to keep all their toys. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thegrimreaperwrites.blogspot.com/2011/01/hotel-owners-gay-couple-and-damaging.html#IDComment124250163</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atheist Revolution : Atheism Shouldn't Offend...But It Often Does</title>
<link>http://www.atheistrev.com/2011/01/atheism-shouldn-offendbut-it-often-does.html#IDComment123478473</link>
<description>I think it&amp;#039;s human nature. There are some things that are so heavily woven into the fabric of our thought. When we find a counter-example it throws us off and our response can be quite hostile. I&amp;#039;m still pretty freaked out when I meet an *adult* who takes Noah&amp;#039;s Ark as world history rather than--as my Roman Catholic teachers taught me and I assumed until 1994 everybody knew--a legend akin to the Odyssey. Not only that, I have been known to get downright stroppy if I think such an ignoramus is being allowed anywhere near the reins of my country&amp;#039;s science and education policies. I feel quite strong emotions about this. Now if I became familiar with this person, a lot of the emotional component might dissipate leaving me only with a relatively dispassionate negative they of their qualifications. On the other hand my feelings negatively affect my willingness to associate with such people so the situation is self-reinforcing. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atheistrev.com/2011/01/atheism-shouldn-offendbut-it-often-does.html#IDComment123478473</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atheist Revolution : Questions for Those Raising Their Kids Without Religion</title>
<link>http://www.atheistrev.com/2011/01/questions-for-those-raising-their-kids.html#IDComment119197643</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m British living in London so my experience probably isn&amp;#039;t typical of the kind of thing that happens in North America. I&amp;#039;m a father, I grew up in a Roman Catholic environment, but grew away from organized religion long before I had children.  Britain has mandatory religious education, of sorts. It also has mandatory school assemblies of a &amp;quot;broadly Christian&amp;quot; character. That&amp;#039;s all rubbish, because most British people regard religion as very personal and private. The stereotype of the tight-buttoned Englishman is true to that extent. We don&amp;#039;t like to offend or show offence. As a result the law is interpreted liberally. Religious education is very ecumenical, and those who complain about that are treated with kindness and pity. Those are formidable weapons!  My children have been exposed to religious beliefs and traditions all their lives. My wife&amp;#039;s sister is a Witness and has attempted to give religious instruction to them--with the highest of motives, and without objection from us. None of our business. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Jan 2011 20:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atheistrev.com/2011/01/questions-for-those-raising-their-kids.html#IDComment119197643</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Blogging Tips : 5 Twitter Web Apps to Try</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/02/17/5-twitter-web-apps-to-try/#IDComment117123744</link>
<description>Twitter is telling me the old web interface (known as #oldtwitter to users) won&amp;#039;t be around for much longer. I find the new version cluttered and useless so I came here looking for web-based alternatives. Hahlo looks pretty good.  I think trying to make Twitter look like an app is exactly the wrong way to go. If only desktop app designers would make the effort to produce software as clear and unfussy as the Hahlo web interface! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/02/17/5-twitter-web-apps-to-try/#IDComment117123744</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atheist Revolution : Scolded for Not Attending Church</title>
<link>http://www.atheistrev.com/2010/11/scolded-for-not-attending-church.html#IDComment110114220</link>
<description>It may well make a difference which country you live in (and you mention the bible belt so we&amp;#039;re talking about a particular part of America).  For instance living in the UK I think the boot is on the other foot. Churchgoing is a minority activity and churchgoers might feel uncomfortable appearing to proselytize to people they have to work with.  A bit of consideration makes the workplace run smoothly. &amp;quot;I don&amp;#039;t believe in God&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;I don&amp;#039;t believe in formal worship,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I don&amp;#039;t want to go to church&amp;quot; seem like reasonable responses to me. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atheistrev.com/2010/11/scolded-for-not-attending-church.html#IDComment110114220</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Erictric : Have You Been to Wikipedia This Weekend?</title>
<link>http://erictric.com/2010/11/14/have-you-been-to-wikipedia-this-weekend/#IDComment109904385</link>
<description>What exactly are you moaning about, Eric Calouro? You say yourself that the picture can be vanished by clicking on the x. Do you object to a charity appealing for funds on its own website? On this website I see that you&amp;#039;re carrying very prominent advertisements for third party companies.  How do you square your apparent dual standard in funding this website and the funding of Wikimedia Foundation? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://erictric.com/2010/11/14/have-you-been-to-wikipedia-this-weekend/#IDComment109904385</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>