<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1269512</link>
		<description>Comments by mshumphreycushion</description>
<item>
<title>Columnists : Nadine Dorries MP: Liberal Democrat MPs want to have their Coalition cake and eat it</title>
<link>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thecolumnists/2012/02/nadine-.html#IDComment296254486</link>
<description> &amp;quot;a Conservative majority next time&amp;quot;? Talk about head in the sand!  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 07:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thecolumnists/2012/02/nadine-.html#IDComment296254486</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bloggerheads : Nadine Dorries : extending the hand of hopefulness</title>
<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/05/nadine-dorries-hopefulness/#IDComment152665785</link>
<description>Taking all this into account, can Dorries still stand by her 70/30% fiction nonsense as it is extremely clear that she had no evidence of stalking/harassment, therefore no reason to &amp;quot;disguise&amp;quot; her movements on her blog as she stated to John Lyons who investigated her expenses claims.. Which leads us nicely back to the question, why did she spend so much time in 2009/2010 in Mid Bedfordshire if it was merely her second home, allegedly mostly unfurnished.  Also, where are the school attendance reports for those years for her youngest daughter? If, as she states the daughter only attended part-time whilst taking GCSE&amp;#039;s (very improbable) then can she not supply a school/parent agreement to that effect in order to strengthen her position? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 15:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/05/nadine-dorries-hopefulness/#IDComment152665785</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bloggerheads : Jonathan Lord turned a blind eye </title>
<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/02/jonathan-lord/#IDComment127088130</link>
<description>Good luck with David Cameron. I wrote to him directly for help following Nadine Dorries&amp;#039; smearing of me last year, I asked him to ensure the removal of her libellous blog posts. I am yet to even receive an acknowledgement. The posts are still live on the internet for all to see.  Is this the new &amp;quot;accountability and transparency&amp;quot; he promised us?  Well, it sucks. HC </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/02/jonathan-lord/#IDComment127088130</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://torytottyonline.com/ : Nadine Dorries: From Zero to Hero Once More</title>
<link>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/10/nadine-dorries-from-zero-to-hero-once.html#IDComment122790013</link>
<description>Quick update to this post.. HOC have passed Nadine Dorries&amp;#039; expenses files to the police, she was informed of this in December 2010.    </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/10/nadine-dorries-from-zero-to-hero-once.html#IDComment122790013</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bloggerheads : Nadine Dorries: lies with another man</title>
<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/01/nadine-dorries-lies-with-another-man/#IDComment120500713</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Sue Cullen is absolutely not disabled&amp;quot;... &amp;quot;Ms Cullen also once tweeted that she was on disability benefit&amp;quot; &amp;quot;  She stormed around the hall after me, shouted a great deal and even followed me outside, pacing up and down whilst I chatted to constituents&amp;quot; &amp;quot; An operation on both feet for arthritis? Let&amp;rsquo;s put aside that surgeons never operate on both feet at the same time. This is a medical breakthrough. Hips and knees, yes, now feet! Amazing.  Twitter followers conned again&amp;quot;  I could go on...  Ms Dorries you are a liar, period.    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/01/nadine-dorries-lies-with-another-man/#IDComment120500713</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bloggerheads : Iain Dale tells lies shock</title>
<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2010/12/iain-dale-tells-lies-shock/#IDComment116480266</link>
<description>Harry Cole appeared on television recently defending Nadine over her &amp;quot;70% fictiontogetoutoflyingtojohnlyon expose&amp;quot;.. : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=MsHumphreycushion#p/u/5/My6pR21ZhdY&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=MsHumphreycus...&lt;/a&gt; He also downloaded this video and blogged about it.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2010/12/iain-dale-tells-lies-shock/#IDComment116480266</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://torytottyonline.com/ : Is OCD Sweeping the Blogosphere?</title>
<link>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108537435</link>
<description>&amp;quot;As for the &amp;quot;call to report disabled tweeters&amp;quot;, had anyone actually said that you might in fact have a point, but no one did, so you don&amp;#039;t&amp;quot;  Aside from multiple blogs and the press coverage you mean?  Yes, it is being taken very seriously *taps nose*     If we dont stand up and fight for ourselves, we are in serious danger from this government, while I very much welcome their Welfare reforms, the way they are affecting the disabled is shocking.  Ms Dorries&amp;#039; comments only served to heighten the distress already felt. You can call it what you like, I call it a genuine reaction to an ill-thought out, personal attack on a disabled constituent.    HC       </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108537435</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://torytottyonline.com/ : Is OCD Sweeping the Blogosphere?</title>
<link>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108533221</link>
<description>&amp;quot;little spat&amp;quot;.. ? You have a lot of growing up to do. Perhaps if you were to suffer a disability yourself could empathise a little with the hurt and genuine fear that Ms Dorries&amp;#039; call to report disabled tweeters caused.     HC </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108533221</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://torytottyonline.com/ : Is OCD Sweeping the Blogosphere?</title>
<link>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108401757</link>
<description>Anon.. says it all really. If you cant enter into a debate with a recoginsable ID, why should anyone take you seriousy?  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Nov 2010 18:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108401757</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://torytottyonline.com/ : Is OCD Sweeping the Blogosphere?</title>
<link>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108355700</link>
<description>Really?  Oh yes, because I tweet about current affairs, disability and reply personally to every tweeter..  this week&amp;#039;s topics have included Vitiligo, Arthritis, Save Ashtiani and the X-Factor.. what a rotten person I am : )  I REALLY wish people such as yourself and Catey would stop using mental health issues in a negative way in order to attempt to smear and belittle people.  If you havent got a decent argument, imply mental illnesss... such genius!     </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Nov 2010 10:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108355700</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://torytottyonline.com/ : Is OCD Sweeping the Blogosphere?</title>
<link>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108355368</link>
<description>Collated  - not written myself...  Just to clarify! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Nov 2010 10:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108355368</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://torytottyonline.com/ : Is OCD Sweeping the Blogosphere?</title>
<link>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108291290</link>
<description>Hi Catey,  I remember when David began to compile the list of blogs featured above. It was very good of him to do so.  I dont consider him obsessed, it makes sense to keep all the relevant posts in one place and update the list with new ones.  I did the same as you know, when Ms Dorries made her disablist comments.  I collated over 30 posts on the subject in just 2 days, which made it easier to share with Disability Now, other media  and the HOC.   If you search the hashtag #Dorries , you will see that David is not alone in tweeting or blogging about Ms Dorries, she seems to have hit several nerves of late.  Singling him out as you have has made you look a little ill informed and petty to be honest.  By making suggestions about David&amp;#039;s mental health, you are also resorting to the sort of smearing akin to that of Ms Dorries and Guido Fawkes.  Please also bear in mind the disablist comments that caused such a fuss before, you surely dont want to be accused of similar behaviour regarding the condition OCD?  Thank you for allowing me to comment, I wish all Tory bloggers were as responsible as you.  Regards, HC   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/is-ocd-sweeping-blogosphere.html#IDComment108291290</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://torytottyonline.com/ : David Allen Green Semi-Fisked: Nadine Dorries and Her Blog</title>
<link>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/david-allen-green-semi-fisked-nadine.html#IDComment107353584</link>
<description>As the contituent of Ms Dorries, attacked and libelled on her blog I feel compelled to comment.  I trust you will publish this.   I am NOT a benefit thief, I AM disabled. I do NOT claim ANY health related benefits as I am currently employed.   The posts Ms Dorries wrote about me were not only ill-informed but particularly viscious.  As a nominated candidate for local council, they were also in breach of the law:  Representation of the People Act 1983 (c. 2)    HC  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.torytottyonline.com/2010/11/david-allen-green-semi-fisked-nadine.html#IDComment107353584</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bloggerheads : Nadine Dorries is a corrupt liar</title>
<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2010/10/nadine-dorries-corrupt-liar/#IDComment105255803</link>
<description>I am interested to see her travel claims for that period, if as she says, she spent most of her time in the Cotswolds, there will be very few Thameslink train ticket claims..   ( p.s.. I know its legal to leave a 15 year old alone but all week so she can attend her Bedforshire school whilst you live miles away? ) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2010/10/nadine-dorries-corrupt-liar/#IDComment105255803</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bloggerheads : Nadine Dorries and the most pathetic hatchet job in political history</title>
<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2010/10/nadine-dorries-hatchet/#IDComment103481834</link>
<description>Thank you Tim. I have been advised to not comment publically yet on the details of Ms Dorrie&amp;#039;s accusations, knowing you are putting the truth out there is incredibly reassuring to me. Once I get the go-ahead, I shall be making a statement.   (Thanks to everyone who is supporting me, you have no idea how much I appreciate it)  xx </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2010/10/nadine-dorries-hatchet/#IDComment103481834</guid>
</item><item>
<title>And another thing... : Devaluing opposition</title>
<link>http://www.tomharris.org.uk/2010/08/29/devaluing-opposition/#IDComment95806075</link>
<description>I suspect that had the Coalitiont announced it properly, rather than it being the result of yet another cock-up, it may not have caused so much genuine fear. Time and again we are told of their plans via leaks, they are to governing what cowboy builders are to plumbing.  The Brokeback reference is proving valid on another level.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.tomharris.org.uk/2010/08/29/devaluing-opposition/#IDComment95806075</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bloggerheads : Atomic batteries to power. Turbines to speed. </title>
<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2010/07/atomic-batteries-to-power-turbines-to-speed/#IDComment89762589</link>
<description> Tim, whatever&amp;#039;s going on with you, hope you work it out. Be lucky x </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2010/07/atomic-batteries-to-power-turbines-to-speed/#IDComment89762589</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>