<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/3815073</link>
		<description>Comments by magnoliasouth</description>
<item>
<title>Made Remade : Practicing Pet Safety With A DIY Car Hammock</title>
<link>http://blog.diynetwork.com/maderemade/2013/01/24/diy-dog-car-safety-hammock/#IDComment969005369</link>
<description>Actually, the large hammock at Amazon is $30, or it was when I bought them, several years apart. I have one for both cars now and they&amp;#039;re incredibly durable. Now this is great if you don&amp;#039;t mind the effort and you want something more cute, but I thought users may wish to know that they can be had for the same price pre-made. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 May 2015 15:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.diynetwork.com/maderemade/2013/01/24/diy-dog-car-safety-hammock/#IDComment969005369</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gingrich&#039;s Campaign Performance Transcends His &#039;Personal Baggage&#039;</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2011/10/29/gingrichs-campaign-performance-transcends-his-personal-baggage/#IDComment214107456</link>
<description>So what did he get in return though? Usually the &amp;#039;caving in&amp;#039; is in response to an agreement on other terms. I&amp;#039;m not taking up for him, mind you. Clinton may not have conceded on anything in return, but I&amp;#039;m just curious. My question is genuine and not sarcasm.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 01:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2011/10/29/gingrichs-campaign-performance-transcends-his-personal-baggage/#IDComment214107456</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gingrich&#039;s Campaign Performance Transcends His &#039;Personal Baggage&#039;</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2011/10/29/gingrichs-campaign-performance-transcends-his-personal-baggage/#IDComment214106372</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m coming in late to the game here, comment wise, but there is something required that Newt doesn&amp;#039;t have: likability thus winability. Too many moderates are less forgiving of Newt&amp;#039;s past. Most conservatives will agree, that we need the moderates to win. At this point in time, I am fully supporting anyone who has the ability to beat Obama. That means that moderates will have to support whatever candidate that may be. I would much prefer a strong conservative like Newt and I have no beef with him at all. I like the man and feel he&amp;#039;s a great person, it&amp;#039;s just that too many disagree with me.   Politics is a nasty business. Bill Clinton beat two great men (Bush and Dole) and all because of his charisma alone. It wasn&amp;#039;t his resume that got him into the white house. Most voters don&amp;#039;t care about that. My own grandmother (may her saintly Christian soul rest in peace) said she liked him because of his smile! I couldn&amp;#039;t believe my ears. This was a fiercely conservative church-going woman. Despite all his shenanigans, she still liked him!  The point is, we need someone strong, that has charisma and has the ability to make moderates (and independents) happy. I hate to say it because it shows how shallow our country has become, but there it is. I have decided, for myself, who I think best fits that... even it&amp;#039;s still not the perfect solution. I&amp;#039;ve at least decided which Republican I&amp;#039;m going with in the primary. In any case, we seriously need charm because right now it&amp;#039;s everything. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 01:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2011/10/29/gingrichs-campaign-performance-transcends-his-personal-baggage/#IDComment214106372</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>