ladysforest

ladysforest

70p

93 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0

8 years ago @ Birther Report - Hearing Set: Canadian-... · 0 replies · +10 points

Tony - you are quite correct. Unfortunately. And soooo few Judges have even read the Constitution since their childhood, nor have they studied it at all as relates to Presidential eligibility. Not to mention all the "living document" Judges out there.

8 years ago @ Birther Report - Shock Video: Geraldo R... · 0 replies · +4 points

Errrrrrrrrrr. I know. If just ONE lawyer says that they believe Ted to be nbC, all the other lawyers follow. It's maddening. Look, the Constitution is written in layman's language. It is brief. The path to become a self-proclaimed Constitutional Scholar is what, exactly?

8 years ago @ Birther Report - Shock Video: Geraldo R... · 0 replies · +4 points

Hi! Best of wishes for a fantastic New Year to you as well!

8 years ago @ Birther Report - Shock Video: Geraldo R... · 0 replies · +8 points

And I used a BR youtube video of a Cruz interview in the post. I hadn't seen that one before - it's very ... informative.

8 years ago @ Birther Report - Shock Video: Geraldo R... · 6 replies · +21 points

I saw that Hannity show and I was just stunned that Geraldo got it right! I mean - Geraldo for petes sake! LOL

Anyway, I pulled some Cruz stuff together in a post if anyone is looking for a bit of "timeline" on his Canadian problem eruption. https://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2016/0...

8 years ago @ Birther Report - PolitiFact: Article II... · 2 replies · +2 points

WOW, sounds like he didn't just take his moms birth certificate down to the PO to get his passport. Seems that there is a burden of proof to be met in order to establish citizenship that is fairly complex.

THIS: "under the provision of law or treaty under which the person is claiming U.S. citizenship or non-citizen nationality." Of law or treaty, eh? I can't recall ever having to meet requirements of a law or treaty myself, not to claim my US citizenship. Just showed a copy of a certified U.S. birth cert. and that pretty much did it.

8 years ago @ Birther Report - PolitiFact: Article II... · 4 replies · +6 points

Can you give the link for that process? And BTW, the article stated that Ted's mother registered him at the U.S. Consulate, I assume that the writer got that info from Ted or his team. Which implies that this would be the correct process to follow.

So, if, unnecessary, how and why is that done? Why would any American who has a child outside of the US even bother? Ever? Why bother to pass a NATURALIZATION LAW at all? Why have forms to fill out?

Again, a natural born Citizen does not renounce their Canadian citizenship which they acquired at the moment of birth. Not a nbC American anyway.

8 years ago @ Birther Report - PolitiFact: Article II... · 0 replies · +11 points

Oh, and a natural-born American citizen will never have to fill out forms to renounce his Canadian citizenship. IMHO

8 years ago @ Birther Report - PolitiFact: Article II... · 6 replies · +7 points

His mother took the step of registering his birth at the U.S. consulate in Canada, so that the U.S. NATURALIZATION LAWS in place could operate to extend/confer her citizenship to him. He was a Canadian at birth and in order to claim U.S. citizenship proof had to be provided and forms had to be filled out and approved and filed. What I do not know, and was not made clear in one old article I recently read, was when she did that. The article said she registered him, and that he got a U.S. passport in the mid-eighties. So, did she only register him in the eighties so that he could go on the school trip with his U.S. classmates? Or had he been registered prior to the Cruz's leaving Canada when Ted was little?

8 years ago @ Birther Report - Full Audio: Dr. Grace ... · 2 replies · +5 points

To a different issue that I believe Cruz will have - his wife leaving her job. WHY did a wife, who was obviously very successful in her own right, presumably making great money (probably more than Ted), having great insurance coverage, WHY did she sacrifice her own career and step aside from a lucrative career? Because it would reflect badly on a CONSERVATIVE that the wife worked at Goldman Sachs. So, the woman has to make herself unemployed, the family loses needed income and insurance so that the husband can have a chance to get his name out there with out her being a liability. Where are the lefties screaming "war on women"? I am surprised that she would quit so early in the race. Especially since Ted is not polling well at all. Any idea how the Indies view Ted? Think they are embracing him, or will embrace him?