<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1267833</link>
		<description>Comments by kostyavs</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : Hubris and Humility: David Weigel Comes Clean on &lt;i&gt;Washington Post,&lt;/i&gt; the D.C. Bubble, &amp; the &#039;Jou</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dweigel/2010/06/28/hubris-and-humility-david-weigel-comes-clean-on-washington-post-the-d-c-bubble-the-journolist/#IDComment82737995</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d like to know the justification for creating maintaining and participation in a listserv discussion group that has the potential to shape media coverage of politicians that share your idealogical persuasion and how that that coordination to shape messaging is not in effect a huge in kind coordinated political contribution and abuse of power.  What if conservatives did this, that would be a &amp;#039;vast right wing conspiracy&amp;quot; or something like that.  But when hundreds of the most prominent liberal media types do it , its business as usual, nothing wrong here, move along please.  Give me a break.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dweigel/2010/06/28/hubris-and-humility-david-weigel-comes-clean-on-washington-post-the-d-c-bubble-the-journolist/#IDComment82737995</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>