en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2333467 Comments by jkinne7 http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119084902 Oh, she is really good. Where does the "popular" press find these brainless twits? I would think that ABC/CBS/NBC and all of the others would be quite circumspect about their choices of hirings. Did they not get the message 2 months ago? Do they somehow believe that they are insulated from the reprecussions of the obvious fallacious positions/stands that they took on news stories and the venimous tripe they spewed prior to the elections? Can they not see that previous administrations can not be blamed ad infinitum for every ill that society conjures up? Maybe joiurnalism students should be required to get a business degree first so they can first understand how the business world works and the impact that governmental regulation and the detrimental impact that their more recent thieving nature can have in the "real" world in which all of us mere mortals are required to exist before being allowed to write/comment about it! Sat, 1 Jan 2011 22:11:28 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119084902 http://tv.breitbart.com/liberal-star-blogger-ezra-klein-constitution-has-no-binding-power-on-anything-confusing-because-its-over-100-years-old/#IDComment118784997 OK, so the Constitution has no binding power. I guess that means that you, Mr Klein, no longer have any expectation/protection from Article I - you know - freedom of speech/press???? I vote Mr Ezra Klein be placed under arrest by the secret police, never to be heard from again. And while we're at it, why not excercise a little "extraodinary rendition" and see if after a couple of days Mr Klein would be nearly as dismissive of our 100 year old document as his self-annointed arrogance would lead the reader to believe. Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:42:28 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/liberal-star-blogger-ezra-klein-constitution-has-no-binding-power-on-anything-confusing-because-its-over-100-years-old/#IDComment118784997