jeffreyquick
55p
30 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
10 years ago @ http://chantcafe.com/ - Liturgical Music in th... · 0 replies · +1 points
11 years ago @ http://chantcafe.com/ - Who you callin\' \"Bi-... · 0 replies · +2 points
11 years ago @ http://chantcafe.com/ - The History of Solfege... · 0 replies · +3 points
Church: "You want this sight-singing system we developed? We're not using it for anything."
11 years ago @ http://chantcafe.com/ - Tastes Like Mozart, So... · 0 replies · +2 points
11 years ago @ http://chantcafe.com/ - Ubi Caritas - Stephens · 1 reply · +1 points
11 years ago @ http://chantcafe.com/ - Ubi Caritas - Stephens · 1 reply · +1 points
11 years ago @ http://chantcafe.com/ - Date and Location Anno... · 1 reply · +2 points
13 years ago @ Chant Cafe - Improved site design? · 0 replies · -1 points
13 years ago @ Chant Cafe - There Is a Way Out · 0 replies · +6 points
Of course, I LOVE Renaissance polyphony. But the notion that emerged in the 19th century that the only proper polyphonic repertoire for the Mass is High Renaissance imitative polyphony or modern imitations is still very much with us. It's damaging to the cause of Catholic church music because it ignores what came before and after, and by so doing implies that it was less than optimal. If that was the ideal, than the church has nearly always violated the ideal. Now, chant IS integral to the Mass (your real point here), and the more I sing it, the more convinced I am of this. But if chant is the pasta and polyphony the sauce, we have lots of options for what to make the sauce from.
13 years ago @ Chant Cafe - History, In Reverse · 0 replies · +3 points