guinness13494

guinness13494

-1p

4 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

13 years ago @ Listverse - Top 10 Creepy Aspects ... · 3 replies · +6 points

For number 9 it totally sounds as if he said "Whore house"

13 years ago @ Listverse - Top 10 Difficult Liter... · 3 replies · -2 points

I would add the Iliad and the Odyssey. Although the plot is great I feel way to distant when I read both the book, the format of the writing gets very confusing.

13 years ago @ Listverse - 11 Brain-Twisting Par... · 2 replies · +1 points

I think if you acknowledge there's an Omnipotence being then you also acknowledge that he's evil. Most religions have a version of hell or some evil being that opposes the god. But if the god can do anything then why doesn't he kill the evil guy right now? Basically you have to acknowledge that the god is keeping the devil alive because he wants him alive to taunt and trick us for all our lives, and If god wants someone to taunt and trick us our entire lives then isn't he himself the "devil or evil entity?" That's the Logan Lyke paradox, if their exists any omnipotence being then he's the devil.

13 years ago @ Listverse - Top 10 Bizarre Apocaly... · 0 replies · +1 points

Hey guys, I'm a nanoscientist currently attending the most advanced nanocollege in the world and figured I'd give you the true facts about what he ranked as the "#1 way we're all going to die." It is true that as a community nanosceintists are trying to create nanobots for non-incision surgery and collecting tissue samples, but but what the author failed to mention is that the "nanobots" aren't actually little robots that go inside but instead it most closely resembles a bacteria of sorts that's built from carbon atoms. The authors thinking is flawed because the nanobots act much like a human who has cancer or a sickness, although the cancer or bacteria is spreading throughout their body it doesn't give cancer to anyone/anything that touches them the same is true for nanobots. nanobots would be a living bacteria that would be controlled and like any other bacteria it will die when it's host dies. Another few interesting facts is that the reproduction of the nanobot would make about one copy per six hours so I have no idea where he got the idea that in 72 hours we're all going to be dead. And for god sake's people have a little faith in the scientists! The people working on the collider in France and nanotechnology are some of the smartest people in the world and they don't just run experiments without first getting it approved by a large portion of the scientific community.