<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1405724</link>
		<description>Comments by eMuse5</description>
<item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Why I&#039;m a Global Warming Skeptic </title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/10/why-im-a-global-warming-skeptic/#IDComment164813993</link>
<description>...and a mature comeback, too!  It&amp;#039;s like Christmas. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/10/why-im-a-global-warming-skeptic/#IDComment164813993</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Obama-Style Honor</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/20/obama-style-honor/#IDComment164813108</link>
<description>...Not to mention how many times the Obamas have both insulted and embarrassed themselves in front of the British...insane considering that England is an important ally... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/20/obama-style-honor/#IDComment164813108</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Can Sarah Win?</title>
<link>http://dev.frontpagemag.com/2011/06/01/can-sarah-win/#IDComment161798296</link>
<description>If she runs, Michelle Bachmann should be her running mate.  Democrats, faced with the awkward situation that would ensue upon TWO Republican females running for the Big Offices at once, will have no choice but to admit that they are not &amp;quot;pro-womyn&amp;quot; in any way, shape, or form, but are in fact &amp;quot;pro-liberal policies/agendas/beliefs&amp;quot; alone. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://dev.frontpagemag.com/2011/06/01/can-sarah-win/#IDComment161798296</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Can Sarah Win?</title>
<link>http://dev.frontpagemag.com/2011/06/01/can-sarah-win/#IDComment161797497</link>
<description>Sanjay: You realize that &amp;quot;neo-con marxist&amp;quot; is an oxymoron, right? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://dev.frontpagemag.com/2011/06/01/can-sarah-win/#IDComment161797497</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : The Dark World of the Arab Child Slave Trade</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/10/the-dark-world-of-the-arab-child-slave-trade/#IDComment161775135</link>
<description>So you strongly object to the idea that the writer might be indicting Arabs for the child slave trade, but also strongly object to him not placing all blame on Islam?  In my mind, the majority of people in Arab countries are Muslim, so isn&amp;#039;t that what Brown is doing anyway?    Maybe I&amp;#039;m just a bit confused by your comment and need clarification, but you do know that you and he are on the same side...right? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 19:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/10/the-dark-world-of-the-arab-child-slave-trade/#IDComment161775135</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : The Left’s Absurd Defense of Rapper Common</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/17/the-left%e2%80%99s-absurd-defense-of-the-rapper-common/#IDComment161730117</link>
<description>Alright folks, lets bet back on track.  Yes, it is true that &amp;quot;Song for Assata&amp;quot; is not about killing police.  But it&amp;#039;s also true that it&amp;#039;s a defense of a former member of the Black Panthers (not exactly an organization that should be held in high esteem) who was convicted of a state trooper&amp;#039;s murder.  Never mind that the state trooper, a man and fellow human being, DIED--Shakur may have initially recieved some substandard medical treatment, so let&amp;#039;s use her as a symbol of racial injustice and enshrine her memory in song!  Can we paint &amp;quot;controversial&amp;quot; on this with a big huge &amp;quot;DUH&amp;quot; stamped across it as well?      It&amp;#039;s also noteworthy that Shakur has become a type of cult figure for hard-left political activists who are the type who try to pin any action by cops against people who happened to be of color as being racially-motivated.  And lastly, let&amp;#039;s remember that the above isn&amp;#039;t the only reason Shapiro thinks that Michelle Obama shouldn&amp;#039;t have invited Common to the White House--Common also doesn&amp;#039;t believe in interracial relationships and used semi-violent rhetoric against Bush.  No doubt among other things. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/17/the-left%e2%80%99s-absurd-defense-of-the-rapper-common/#IDComment161730117</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : The Left’s Absurd Defense of Rapper Common</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/17/the-left%e2%80%99s-absurd-defense-of-the-rapper-common/#IDComment161724540</link>
<description>Ricky: Use ad hominem arguments much? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/17/the-left%e2%80%99s-absurd-defense-of-the-rapper-common/#IDComment161724540</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : It&#039;s Not About Sesame Street </title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/09/it-isnt-about-sesame-street/#IDComment161721579</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Highly selective and subjective&amp;quot;??  He interviews people who wield the power at the networks and the creators of some of the biggest shows in modern TV.  All is thoroughly documented with bios, direct quotes, filmed interviews, etc.  You simply can&amp;#039;t lamely try to cry &amp;quot;subjective&amp;quot; in the face of so much evidence.  Give it a read! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/09/it-isnt-about-sesame-street/#IDComment161721579</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Why I&#039;m a Global Warming Skeptic </title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/10/why-im-a-global-warming-skeptic/#IDComment161715771</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t think your original comment had even a quarter of the entertainment value that all your subsequent &amp;quot;sarcastic&amp;quot; comments have.  Thank you to the moderator for providing me with some smiles as I begin my day! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/10/why-im-a-global-warming-skeptic/#IDComment161715771</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : 28 Revolting Quotes That Define the Pro-Abortion Left</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/12/12/28-revolting-quotes-that-define-the-pro-abortion-left/#IDComment151591074</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m flattered. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 02:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/12/12/28-revolting-quotes-that-define-the-pro-abortion-left/#IDComment151591074</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : 28 Revolting Quotes That Define the Pro-Abortion Left</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/12/12/28-revolting-quotes-that-define-the-pro-abortion-left/#IDComment149679605</link>
<description>You, sir, are a troll. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 May 2011 06:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/12/12/28-revolting-quotes-that-define-the-pro-abortion-left/#IDComment149679605</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : 10 Leftists Who Need Condolences on the Death of their Hero Osama bin Laden</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/05/06/10-leftists-who-need-condolences-on-death-of-hero-osama-bin-laden-1/#IDComment149665302</link>
<description>I had a hunch, so I went over to Salon to take a look at their headlines.  Sure enough, there they were, as predictable as you could imagine:  &amp;quot;The dangerous precedent of the bin Laden killing: Does the terrorist&amp;#039;s singular evil mean it doesn&amp;#039;t matter what took place?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Bush torture architect: Killing Osama was wrong! John Woo argues that &amp;#039;a deliberately small force&amp;#039; was sent to Pakistan to ensure bin Laden wouldn&amp;#039;t come back alive,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;UN expert asks US to disclose bin Laden raid facts: An independent investigator on extrajudicial killings has called on the United States to reveal more details,&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;Only 1 killed in bin Laden raid was armed: Anonymous official&amp;#039;s account of events contrasts sharply with that of the White House,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Was killing bin Laden legal? &amp;#039;If a man is not armed, and armed forces go in and kill him, is that legal?&amp;quot;   So predictable...so typical...so unfortunate... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 May 2011 04:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/05/06/10-leftists-who-need-condolences-on-death-of-hero-osama-bin-laden-1/#IDComment149665302</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Top 10 Reasons to Hate Sarah Palin</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment141599205</link>
<description>Really?  Backpedal much?  If you&amp;#039;re going to go through as many lines of type as you did to basically tell someone you thought her head was up her rear end, then at least give yourself the dignity of standing by your remarks rather than lamely trying to convince us that you were &amp;quot;intending a form of self-therapy&amp;quot; and just trying to be &amp;quot;entertaining.&amp;quot;  So in other words aren&amp;#039;t you just saying &amp;quot;it was all just a joke&amp;quot;?  This has got to be one of the weakest forms of argumentation that you can possibly use in the world of Internet forums and comboxes...or in real life, for that matter.  The Limbaugh quote you paraphrased so unknowingly is: &amp;quot;Doing this show with half my brain tied behind my back just to make things fair.&amp;quot;  He says this pretty often at the start of his radio program.    There&amp;#039;s little reason why I or anyone else here should care about your political affiliations.  You are obviously not a conservative.  In the context of this combox, this is all that&amp;#039;s necessary to know. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 14:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment141599205</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : 10 Planned Parenthood Lies Every Pro-Choice Person Should Condemn</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/04/08/planned-parenthood-lies-pro-choice-people-should-condemn/#IDComment141097229</link>
<description>Being someone who is both interested in truth and in using unbiased language on Wikipedia, I took a look at Margaret Sanger&amp;#039;s Wiki article to see for myself if there was any mention of her racist beliefs.  Well, it was mentioned obliquely at best.   So, I fixed up some of the more biased language (I swear this page was edited by some over-zealous feminist highschool senior quoting from a term paper) and then added a couple paragraphs under the section entitled &amp;quot;Eugenics and Euthanasia&amp;quot;, complete with a source, telling about Sanger&amp;#039;s ideas on exterminating African-Americans.  In less than 20 minutes tops my paragraphs had been deleted.  Wow.  Just, wow.    So here is my rallying cry:  let us flood Margaret Sanger&amp;#039;s Wikipedia page with the truth!  Let&amp;#039;s keep adding true information about her support of race-based eugenics until something sticks!  Anyone with me? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/04/08/planned-parenthood-lies-pro-choice-people-should-condemn/#IDComment141097229</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Top 10 Reasons to Hate Sarah Palin</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment136632901</link>
<description>Yikes... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment136632901</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Top 10 Reasons to Hate Sarah Palin</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment136629244</link>
<description>The name rings a bell, I may have visited it before.  Am sure I haven&amp;#039;t commented there however.  Perhaps I will have to go and give it a closer look. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment136629244</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Top 10 Reasons to Hate Sarah Palin</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment136628565</link>
<description>...And yet, you put enough time and effort into carefully crafting this sarcastic reply--while paraphrasing Rush Limbaugh, no less! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment136628565</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MercatorNet : MercatorNet: Axeing Charlie Sheen is not enough</title>
<link>http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/axeing_charlie_sheen_is_not_enough/#IDComment134358077</link>
<description>&amp;quot;In response to Leanne&amp;#039;s comment: do you have proof that Hollywood would be losing money if they left out all the objectionable content? I believe there is a demand for good entertainment.&amp;quot;  Indeed there is, and I have proof.  What film company has so far been one of the most profitable and dare I say well loved on the planet?  Pixar.  Case in point. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 04:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/axeing_charlie_sheen_is_not_enough/#IDComment134358077</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Top 10 Reasons to Hate Sarah Palin</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment133219062</link>
<description>If Sarah Palin were a very liberal Democrat she would already have her face carved in Mt. Rushmore! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Mar 2011 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment133219062</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Top 10 Reasons to Hate Sarah Palin</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment133218858</link>
<description>Gotta love how many &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; must be trolling on here, for a great comment like that on a right-wing site to get those thumbs down...but you definitely get a thumbs up from me! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Mar 2011 23:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/02/top-10-reasons-to-hate-sarah-palin/#IDComment133218858</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>