diberville2009

diberville2009

18p

11 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

12 years ago @ http://www.themarknews... - Religion, State, and t... · 0 replies · +1 points

«Every religious organization wants it's followers to believe that their's is "the right way", which implies that everyone else is wrong. Only when we, as the human race, »

Well, you believe that yours is "the right way", which implies that everyone else is wrong. Only when we, as the human race, etc.

Yes, you too have a religious outlook !

12 years ago @ http://www.themarknews... - Religion, State, and t... · 0 replies · +2 points

Why do you take at face value what the Supreme Court says about the nature of this course ? Why don't you go back to the facta ?
http://www.xn--pourunecolelibre-hqb.com/2012/03/e...

13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - What's good for the Ca... · 0 replies · +1 points

Hmmm. No gay gene has been discovered.

And even so, let's say serial killers, sex maniacs, liars inherit their failings... So what?

13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - What's good for the Ca... · 0 replies · +1 points

It makes no difference in Quebec whether you are public funded or not in Quebec : you have to teach what the state has decided and even how the state is decided (that's basically what Loyola gained : no in matters of values, the State cannot say you have to teach it in a relativistic way).

13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - What's good for the Ca... · 0 replies · +1 points

You are terminally stupid since you stated a stupid idea. That's the cute semantic difference, Mike T. Yes, very basic.

13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - What's good for the Ca... · 0 replies · +1 points

The governement has a HUGE say in the curriculum : all of the compulsoty curriculum in fact for only 50 % of the tuition fee (there are other fees for sport, theatre, etc.) in the case of Loyola.

That's a HUGE saving for the state for a huge say.

In fact, Loyola will still teach the ERC program but will not have to say that there is no truth, or that there are not some values preferable to other ones (what happens in public school with the ERC course ), which I believe is countrary to good education. Whatever your values.

Personally, I believe public schools should disappear and parents be far less taxed and thus stop all state imposition and monopoly on the curriculum (even schools receiving no subsidies in Quebec get their curriculum imposed!) and even the teaching methods (skill-based socio-constructivism).

13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - What's good for the Ca... · 0 replies · +1 points

" but the fact of the matter is that the Roman Catholic Church does in fact teach that homosexuality is a sin, not natural and strongly opposes same sex marriage to the point in Quebec of at least one Bishop calling on voters to vote against parties that support same sex marriage.
"

What's wrong with that position? Why must everyone agree with the Gay agenda?

13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - What's good for the Ca... · 0 replies · +2 points

Again, Emily, even if that were true, it does not contradict what TedTylerEzro said : doctrine can be evil, sin also, but not people they are only sinners who can always repent and be saved.

13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - What's good for the Ca... · 0 replies · +2 points

Yes, it does. Very good thing. Oh, darn, Mr Patriquin will soon complain about the lack of other religious synbols.

13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - What's good for the Ca... · 0 replies · 0 points

" I have no clue what that exactly means,"

That's exactly what I think of Mr. Patriquin's article.

"This much is for sure: it will teach that homosexuals are evil"

This is outer nonsense, Mr. Patriquin should learn more about the Catholic doctrine : the Church has nothing against homosexuals (we are all sinners) only against homosexuality (a sin).

Finally, since when is it atonishing that an elite Catholic school in a Catholic province (if only sociologically) should not be treated as some freak taliban madrasa ?

I'm French speaking and totally agree with this ruling... Sorry to note that Maclean's is opposed to it and opposed to freedom of choice for Quebec's parents. Maclean's has been better inspired.