Other sources report a major defeat for Kiev loyalists.

Now another "decisive" offensive is announced by the Kiev junta.

One thing is verifiable, both sides hold on the about same positions and there's no military breakthrough.

Europe countries are overrun by the EU criminal project. Certainly EU tends to incorporate all the geographical area beyond Russia's reach so, again geographically, tends to overlap with Europe - the continent. But using Europe for EU political construct is not only abusive in terms of geographical consistency but also from a historical and cultural point of view. EU is not the inheritor of either western political culture traditions or its ethics and spirituality. Even less when it comes to the eastern countries, literally under a colonial status.

EU shouldn't be identified, insidiously, with Europe only because it contains European in its name. Would be comparable with calling rape as love making.

False from start to end.

Both Iraq and Afghanistan were fully supported by a plethora of EU countries who stayed or are staying with troops to the bitter end or at least for many years, lives and money lost.

Libyan mess was French initiated.

Both UK & France, the only EU countries with some capability to project force at some distance, support now (see Syria adventure) foreign intervention, France being more vocal than anyone.

Aggression against Libya was happily supported by Italy, for instance, followed closely by all EU countries eager and able to cut a slice of the oil & gas resources pie there.

France ventured on its own (or tried, at least) in Cote d'Ivoire and Mali. France supports logistically the ongoing low intensity war in the horn of Africa (Djibouti base). UK, Spain, Italy and every other EU country which has airfields or other facilities in range of various wars and strikes US wants lends their use.

CIA was helped, up to some degree, by various EU countries with the rendering scandal.

Kosovo and, before that, all the former Yugoslavia conflicts were desired and fueled by EU countries, Germany, France, UK - the major players - first. They didn't need US incentive. And they don't obey US orders, EU illegal superstate included, in humiliating Serbia today.

The mess is the result of US and EU actions combined.

And stop using Europe for EU. Europe is not EU and will never be.

Meanwhile the Russians have plused, suggesting international control over Syrian chemical weapons while Syrian foreign affairs minister already appreciates the idea. Better poker than russian roulette.

Interesting. The article is very straightforward, the part referring to the "original" Israeli intercept flatly rejects all Obama's admin allegations. And, from how the article is structured, it stops just short of calling Obama a liar (which everyone knows he is). Maybe the purpose is to remind Obama himself that he is politically expendable (which everyone also knows but only some have the necessary clout to have their message received).

I'm afraid world holds its breath for a different reason.

There's no such thing as "EU statement". Only individual countries matter. In the EU ritualistic gatherings all kind of stupidities or politically correct invocations may happen but, for the time being, EU members are sovereign states and decide for themselves what to do. The double digits are the anglo-saxon bloc, the comical France and Israel. All counted twice probably. Of course, if the US goes to war more will pay lip service and send some symbolic support. So it's still up to US and its people to stop the catastrophe.

A list of all services available and tariffs would be very helpful. Do they offer discounts for bulk invasions ?

Insane !

Iraq is a rogue state that should be bombed into submission. Wait, it has already been done ! The results seem rather ambiguous, but, hey, this shouldn't discourage Kerry's call for war in Syria.